Microsoft being sued?
Originally Posted by Incubus,Dec 5 2005, 11:12 PM
...and if the product release was postponed (to combat this problem), the consumers would be whining that they keep pushing the release back.
You can't have both...Gran Turismo 4 was the same way. No problems with my game, though I waited for a LONG time to get it.
You can't have both...Gran Turismo 4 was the same way. No problems with my game, though I waited for a LONG time to get it.
<-- Still waiting for GT4 mobile for my PSP!
Originally Posted by WarrenW,Dec 6 2005, 01:44 AM
Well maybe if Microsoft would actually make something that DOESN'T break down, they wouldn't be getting sued.
Maybe if Microsoft was a Japanese company, the computer would run forever without breaking down. Microsoft is like the Ford of computers - Fix Or Repair Daily, Found On The Road Dead, etc.
Warren
Maybe if Microsoft was a Japanese company, the computer would run forever without breaking down. Microsoft is like the Ford of computers - Fix Or Repair Daily, Found On The Road Dead, etc.
Warren
Originally Posted by jasonw,Dec 6 2005, 12:08 PM
Yet the anti-virus/anti-spyware market still thrives...
Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Dec 6 2005, 12:34 PM
linux, apple, every freaking system has viruses, firefox has been hit too.
Originally Posted by jasonw,Dec 6 2005, 04:45 PM
If you look at the OS design, you will see that Linux and OS X are far less succeptible to viruses. And forget about spyware -- non-existant! And if you think they can't do anything, look at which OS 60% of the internet is run on.
Why waste your time on less than 10% of the population? Virus writers and other code exploiters are looking for the most exposure in the shortest time frame, and right now that means microsoft products. Web servers are rarely the targets, its the home users and business users who are the targets, home users have less ability to track and prosecute and usually have things like credit card info and bank info.
Visa, who I'm pretty sure is a unix/linux shop for much of there online data was hacked into 4 times in the last year or so. I know, I keep getting letters from them saying their database got hacked and they have to send me a new card.
I'll have to see if I still have it, but on one of my security emails I get at work was a big list of all the vulnerabilities in Linux that have been around forever but were never patched because no bothered exploiting them. Some of the better ones were the root hacks and security flaws that allowed hackers to gain root access on linux. Most of the flaws still exists.
The one thing that kills microsoft right now is that there are all these script programs to make viruses with. So every script kiddie out there can make a new virus in about 10 minutes.
Originally Posted by stitos2k,Dec 6 2005, 01:06 PM
I'm not a MS fanboy, but your are incorrect in your statements. OS-X and Linux actually have many of the same flaws that MS does, the only difference is no one is writing code to exploit them.
Unix based OSs do a much better job seperating the end user from the administrator and this is one of the main reasons they are more secure. Also the code/design has been improved upon for 30 years while M$ reinvents a much less stable wheel every 5 years.
Set up a Windows XP box on a cable modem with no extra security and see how much faster it gets infected compared to a Linux or OS X machine! It will die before you can even do the updates!
Sixty percent is close, but the latest numbers have that Apache/Unix servers are on 70% of servers these days, but MS is growing quarterly thanks mainly to German companies.
There used to be a day when well over 90% of servers ran Unix. All the biggest players all still use Unix - Google, Yahoo and Amazon among them.
This thread has gotten totally off topic, but jasonw is pretty much correct with what he said. MS runs admin by default, and MS OS security is nothing but a bit tag on a file - there's no real seperation of anything so its very easy to corrupt the system. Unix variants are much more regulated and users don't run in admin mode by default, so the only way to propogate a virus would be to run in admin mode, which is much harder to do in Unix land.
MS has something like 30,000 known viruses and exploits currently. According to your user theory, if Macs and Unix have a mere 10% market share, there should be around 3,000 viruses for them. There are zero - not because no one is using the OS's, but because they're just built better.
Visa runs Solaris servers for its site - but the web site has nothing to do with their DB systems.
There used to be a day when well over 90% of servers ran Unix. All the biggest players all still use Unix - Google, Yahoo and Amazon among them.
This thread has gotten totally off topic, but jasonw is pretty much correct with what he said. MS runs admin by default, and MS OS security is nothing but a bit tag on a file - there's no real seperation of anything so its very easy to corrupt the system. Unix variants are much more regulated and users don't run in admin mode by default, so the only way to propogate a virus would be to run in admin mode, which is much harder to do in Unix land.
MS has something like 30,000 known viruses and exploits currently. According to your user theory, if Macs and Unix have a mere 10% market share, there should be around 3,000 viruses for them. There are zero - not because no one is using the OS's, but because they're just built better.
Visa runs Solaris servers for its site - but the web site has nothing to do with their DB systems.






