which is more lame, drifting or NASCAR
Originally Posted by Mr.E.G.,Oct 23 2005, 03:33 PM
lets see, drifting uses cars that i kind of like, but in a way that is completley useless.
Have you ever heard the term scrubbing off speed?
By the way, I'd be very surprised if anyone posting on this thread has a clue what drifting really is.
Originally Posted by magician,Oct 23 2005, 09:15 PM
By the way, I'd be very surprised if anyone posting on this thread has a clue what drifting really is.
If Nascrap would do road courses instead of ovals for EVERY TRACK, I could deal with it. But oval racing is the most boring chit ever invented. I'd rather watch paint dry. I have no comment on drifting, could care less about it.
Originally Posted by Saki GT,Oct 24 2005, 05:57 AM
WRC cars drift all the time. Drifting is fun if you can do it, and actually requires a bit of skill. Nascar is holding your line for four hours in a car that's designed to turn left.
"Because of relatively large large slip angles many racing cars appear to be sliding sideways through the turns. This attitude in a turn is called a drift and is looked on by many as the ultimate cornering technique. A car nearing the limit of adhesion will naturally assume this drift if the rear tires operate at large slip angles."
Fred Puhn - How to Make Your Car Handle, H. P. Books, 1976
Slip angles occur only when the tire is rolling, not when it is sliding; hence, a drift occurs when the car is rolling, not sliding. Note that the author mentions nearing the limit of adhesion, not exceeding it. In a perfect drift the car is turning while all four wheels are pointed straight ahead, the tires are rolling - not sliding - and the car is moving sideways; the slip angles on the rear tires are larger than those on the front tires.







