Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Most handsome fighter aircraft?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:44 PM
  #61  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,377
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

[QUOTE=flyingelbowz,Jan 10 2011, 11:29 AM] MiG 29 Fulcrum and the new Chinese J-20.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 02:08 PM
  #62  
EastS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 11
From: SW Florida
Default

Ok I just changed my mind:





My new fav.

The engineers were probably like;
"So we need an interceptor, but a lot faster then usual...."
-"Why don't we just put some wings/cockpit on our satellite delivery rocket?"
That's how mig 25 was born
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 03:46 PM
  #63  
chetly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Traveldude,Jan 10 2011, 08:52 AM
Those "leaks" weren't the result of poor design- it was a necessity given the intense environment the SR-71 operated in.

From SR-71 Wiki

"To allow for thermal expansion at the high operational temperatures, the fuselage panels were manufactured to fit only loosely on the ground. Proper alignment was only achieved when the airframe heated due to air resistance at high speeds, causing the airframe to expand several inches. Because of this, and the lack of a fuel sealing system that could handle the thermal expansion of the airframe at extreme temperatures, the aircraft would leak JP-7 jet fuel onto the runway before it took off. The aircraft would quickly make a short sprint, meant to warm up the airframe, and was then refueled in the air before departing on its mission."

The fact that this thing was developed almost 50 years ago, flew that high and that fast and had stealth aspects to it is astonishing! They used slide rules to design this thing!!
I know what the leaks were there for, I've just never seen a picture of the plane with the leaks showing.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #64  
senor_flojo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
From: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Default

since no one has mentioned the XB-70 Valkyrie yet, I will (sure, it was prototype only, two were built, and one remains):



+1 for f111 aardvark and harrier
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 03:38 AM
  #65  
mingster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

Originally Posted by ITRbroham,Jan 10 2011, 02:37 PM
The thread needs to be re-titled to "Most Handsome Military Aircraft". I'm seeing attack, bomber, and recon aircraft in here.
I said "FIGHTER AIRCRAFT" but people don't read
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 06:29 AM
  #66  
PrimoGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,759
Likes: 1
From: Sun★Works
Default

Originally Posted by mingster,Jan 11 2011, 07:38 AM
I said "FIGHTER AIRCRAFT" but people don't read
even if it said simply aircraft, if the people all think that fighter craft are the most handsome then so be it....LOL


I am with you on this....LOL Comprehension is lost on some HAHAHAHA
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #67  
krnmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Default

Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 09:07 AM
  #68  
21337R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 1
Default

How did the Harrier get nominated for "handsome" fighter?? Don't get me wrong, I think they are awesome but ugly as hell. Definitely function over form.

Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 09:19 AM
  #69  
nt7's Avatar
nt7
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

YF-23

Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 09:23 AM
  #70  
Diego1107's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,085
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by krnmike,Jan 11 2011, 04:06 PM
Void Ray


Although flux vanes are out now so there's really nothing jet about it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 AM.