Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Not here to start a Mac vs PC war

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 05:30 AM
  #131  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by derryck,Sep 15 2010, 07:39 AM
Buy Google stock...they're the next Apple.
Google has had a string of failures in its recent ventures, not sure its the next Apple but the next MS.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 06:57 AM
  #132  
Ted H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
From: Jersey City, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Sep 15 2010, 07:30 AM
Google has had a string of failures in its recent ventures, not sure its the next Apple but the next MS.
You do realize how many decades of failure Apple had, yes?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #133  
zachismisitok's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SpudRacer,Sep 14 2010, 05:21 PM
The major problem with Windows PC's is well....Windows. But then there's the parts bin engineering that all PC manufacturers have adopted to minimize costs that also drives them into a margin sapping price war with all the other clone vendors in a race to the bottom. If you want, or can only afford, cheap and are willing or forced to accept a poor user experience, you buy a Windows machine and focus on the "killer specs" to rationalize your inferiority complex.

Apple has chosen a closed ecosystem where they control key components of the design and supply chain including the OS and many applications. As a result, their unique product competes with none of the clones and they can demand a higher price. If you want the best industrial design, the best innovation, and the best user experience with very solid build quality, you go to Apple and get on with whatever it is you need a computer for.
Your post would make sense ... if it was a "poor user experience". Fortunately, it never is. My pc does what I want it to do, when I want to do it. It's not that dislike macs, but the fact that PCs work for me, very well.

It is laughable to argue pc vs mac when mac has what, like 10% market share.

and in response to others, I find it is mac users ignorantly bashing pcs more so than pc users bothering with macs.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 08:16 AM
  #134  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Ted H,Sep 15 2010, 10:57 AM
You do realize how many decades of failure Apple had, yes?
Apple hasn't had any decades of failure although it almost went under when it was without Steve Jobs. Look at its products and software; it has a pretty good track record for the markets it serves.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 11:53 AM
  #135  
st4rk's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 44
From: Northern Vergina
Default

I love the close-mindedness of M$ haters. They think that Windoze is the only product that M$ produces. They are completely oblivious to the fact that M$ produces several other extremely popular enterprise products that work very well:

Sharepoint (suck it websphere)
Data Protection Manager (eat that tivoli/veritas)
IE (Still has a very high market share, hows the view down there Fx?)
Office suite (rightin letters and shit and destroying openoffice)
System Center Configuration Manager (bladelogic? more like faillogic)
Exchange (lotus bloats? no thanks)
System center operations manager
office communication server (lotus lametime? no thanks)

So they're like "lol windoze sucks, M$ is on the way down, their era is over!!11"

When really, M$ is here to stay, for quite a while. Sorry!

And M$ owns some of Apple, M$ helped them out a while ago when they almost bit the dust
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 12:02 PM
  #136  
icemans2k02's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,798
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by derryck,Sep 15 2010, 05:39 AM
It cracks me up when people get on their anti-Mac soapbox and single them out like they're doing something bad. At least Mac's hardware is more closely controlled and you know what you're getting. Yes they're next to impossible to upgrade but most consumers opt to purchase a new computer rather than upgrade their existing one so that doesn't hold much water as far as I'm concerned. Sure Mac's are over-priced but they are also less problematic and have a superior OS. Sure if you're a techie you can probably get Leopard to run on any hardware but it will be a pain in the rear and most likely will be problematic. If you wan't to beat on people for over-pricing then let's talk about Alienware. I priced out my hardware with Alienware before building my own and they wanted $4K for a machine that I built for $1,200. All this is nothing more than a short term issue anyways...as 'the cloud' continues to gain traction, 'PCs' and OS's for that matter will become obsolete for the most part as this will become a service based industry. Buy Google stock...they're the next Apple.
You do realize all the MBP are Intel based chipsets and processors with Nvidia videos cards. With that being said thats why you can now run SL on standard PC components. I have two hackintosh's that run perfectly fine with SL 10.6.4 and they do the updates just as if they were on my MPB or Air. Mac's are great but Microsoft is not going down anytime soon and they bring innovation to the world as well. Hell if it wasn't for these big companies going after each other they wouldn't have the need to make the innovative changes they do.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 12:43 PM
  #137  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,435
Likes: 1,651
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by st4rk,Sep 15 2010, 11:53 AM
I love the close-mindedness of M$ haters. They think that Windoze is the only product that M$ produces. They are completely oblivious to the fact that M$ produces several other extremely popular enterprise products that work very well:

Sharepoint (suck it websphere)
Data Protection Manager (eat that tivoli/veritas)
IE (Still has a very high market share, hows the view down there Fx?)
Office suite (rightin letters and shit and destroying openoffice)
System Center Configuration Manager (bladelogic? more like faillogic)
Exchange (lotus bloats? no thanks)
System center operations manager
office communication server (lotus lametime? no thanks)

So they're like "lol windoze sucks, M$ is on the way down, their era is over!!11"

When really, M$ is here to stay, for quite a while. Sorry!

And M$ owns some of Apple, M$ helped them out a while ago when they almost bit the dust


Must. . . not. . . give. . . away. . . keys. . . to. . . kingdom. . . from. . . work. . .
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 01:04 PM
  #138  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

Originally Posted by st4rk,Sep 15 2010, 02:53 PM


IE (Still has a very high market share, hows the view down there Fx?)
Umm .... ya might wanna re-phrase that ?

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #139  
PrimoGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,759
Likes: 1
From: Sun★Works
Default

all you fanbois on either side should be worried about:




Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #140  
Voodoo_S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,792
Likes: 4
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by zzziippyyy,Sep 15 2010, 02:04 PM
Umm .... ya might wanna re-phrase that ?

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-mark...rid=1&sample=30
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.