Pets vs SUVs
Registered User
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Moving
To make this article more valid, how about compare the carbon footprint of people in general? You know, make fewer babies.
Oh wait, discouraging reproduction is a sin because we are all entitled to have children.
Oh wait, discouraging reproduction is a sin because we are all entitled to have children.
- That actually made me chuckle!
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Originally Posted by vader1,Dec 23 2009, 10:21 AM
The argument that dogs have a higher carbon footprint than SUVs is dumb for the simple fact that the greatest way to reduce carbon emissions would not be to rid ourselves of dogs, but to rid ourselves of people.
If, in fact, dogs do have a larger carbon footprint than SUVs, then the argument is smart, not dumb.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
I find this all funny, but at the same time I also have a "DGAF" attitude towards it. As long as we have producers and consumers (whether they're people or not) with unlimited wants and needs, we're going to be giving off -insert random harmful thing to the earth that we keep managing to come up with every so often-.
That's just how it is.
That's just how it is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post