Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

playstation 3

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #1  
senor_flojo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
From: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Thumbs up playstation 3

other than the hard drive and game, is there a difference between the 80gig and 160gig PS3's at best buy?

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id...=30&loc=KW-0887

I plan on getting the 80gig and upgrading the hard drive at some point, but I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be missing out on anything with the 160gig version. from what I can tell, there doesn't seem to be a difference...

sorry if this belongs in computers/tech, but there's more traffic in here and I need an answer in a few hours....
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #2  
J'sBlackAP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Default

My 80G is AWESOME, i've had no issues and it loads up games relatively fast.

I wonder why they came out with a 160G...seems like overkill
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
Sabre's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,961
Likes: 12
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

I dont think there is any hardware difference other than maybe the number of USB ports, etc.

If it were me, I'd get the 80Gb and add my own drive for half the cost of the price difference for a 160Gb
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #4  
senor_flojo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
From: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Default

Originally Posted by J'sBlackAP1,Dec 22 2008, 01:52 PM
I wonder why they came out with a 160G...seems like overkill
from what I can tell, to sucker the people who don't know how to swap hard drives.

I really thought that the 160gig would have more options other than a game I have no interest in. however, I can't check gaming forums from work, so I'm kinda in the dark at this point in time.....
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
J'sBlackAP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Default

HAhaha, work PWNS joo!

:-P
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #6  
SoMe0nE2tAlK2's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,674
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

If you can, try to find a first gen PS3.

They have the most backwards compatibility with PS1 and PS2 games. It went downhill after the first gen 60gb's.

I got mine and upgraded the HD a while ago to a 120gb. Couldnt be happier
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 03:58 AM
  #7  
[DT]'s Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
From: Vilano Beach, FL
Default

I posted here before that I think PS1/PS2 backwards compatibility is overrated (let me clarify, IMHO). I have a PS2 sitting here that hasn't been turned on for well over a year. Any PS2 game we've played and are done - once you fire up GT5, Uncharted, Resistance, any current RE, SH, LBP, MGS, etc., etc., you won't want to go back and replay anything PS2 related. I can't even imagine firing up PS1 games...

I will qualify this and say we don't play a ton of games, so if you want to burn through 4 or 5 games a month, you'll run out of PS3 specific titles and might want to go to the back catalog of PS2/PS1 games.

Current gen 80's (though there are a few previous gen still in stock) dropped the USB ports from 4 to 2 and removed the SD/MS card reader. All 160's are like this, as well as 40's (the latter not in production anymore).

However, our "40" is now a 320GB and I added a Nyko accessory to it that converts one of the USB ports into 3, and adds the card reader (for $18). So basically ours has the same ports as the older 80 (and first gen units).

Fun machine! Can't wait to start Silent Hill: Homecoming and for the release of Resident Evil 5! If you're into Horror/Survival type games, Siren is a terrific title that doesn't get as much press as RE, and it a PS3 exclusive.

Our machine gets a good amount of usage as a BD player and a media hub!
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 04:14 AM
  #8  
EP Heart's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 867
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by [DT
,Dec 23 2008, 08:58 AM] I posted here before that I think PS1/PS2 backwards compatibility is overrated (let me clarify, IMHO). I have a PS2 sitting here that hasn't been turned on for well over a year. Any PS2 game we've played and are done - once you fire up GT5, Uncharted, Resistance, any current RE, SH, LBP, MGS, etc., etc., you won't want to go back and replay anything PS2 related. I can't even imagine firing up PS1 games...

I will qualify this and say we don't play a ton of games, so if you want to burn through 4 or 5 games a month, you'll run out of PS3 specific titles and might want to go to the back catalog of PS2/PS1 games.

Current gen 80's (though there are a few previous gen still in stock) dropped the USB ports from 4 to 2 and removed the SD/MS card reader. All 160's are like this, as well as 40's (the latter not in production anymore).

However, our "40" is now a 320GB and I added a Nyko accessory to it that converts one of the USB ports into 3, and adds the card reader (for $18). So basically ours has the same ports as the older 80 (and first gen units).

Fun machine! Can't wait to start Silent Hill: Homecoming and for the release of Resident Evil 5! If you're into Horror/Survival type games, Siren is a terrific title that doesn't get as much press as RE, and it a PS3 exclusive.

Our machine gets a good amount of usage as a BD player and a media hub!
I completely agree with what you said but if you're like me and have a load of PS2 games you haven't finished/played/opened, getting a fully backwards compatible PS3 is a huge plus. Even the first 80GB unit (NOT the one that you'd probably find on BestBuy's site) that had software BC is better than nothing.

But if all you care about is watching movies and playing new games, I wouldn't worry about finding an older model.

BTW, I actually did play a PS1 game a few months ago (the original Metal Gear Solid) on the PS3. It was flippin' horrible, haha. I couldn't tell what I was doing or where I was going sometimes because of how pixelated it was.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 05:43 AM
  #9  
senor_flojo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
From: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Default

well, I still have one of the slim PS2's, so I'm not too worried about backwards compatability.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 05:46 AM
  #10  
EP Heart's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 867
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by senor_flojo,Dec 23 2008, 10:43 AM
well, I still have one of the slim PS2's, so I'm not too worried about backwards compatability.
I still have my old PS2, too, but it's nice to have just 1 system sitting on a rack instead of 2. Also, the PS3 can upscale PS2 games so they look better. So for me, it's a pretty big deal but it's not like I had a choice when I got mine.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 PM.