Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

releasing information by phone?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:04 AM
  #1  
Amit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
From: Monteagle, TN
Default releasing information by phone?

I just got a call at my business from some "liability investigator" from some law firm. He was asking for the previous owner, who hasn't owned the business for almost 4 years. I said he's not available. He persisted, so I told him this person no longer owns this business. Mr. investigator then says: "I didn't ask you if he still owned the business"...so tries to tell me how I'm now involved in the matter and need to comply...I told him to take a hike, and hung up.

He calls back and says, "that wasn't the smartest thing you could've done. Hanging up on me after I told you who I was and from a law firm in Newport Beach. He also asked for the cell phone of the current owner.

Stuff like this has happened before, as it seems the previous owner might have had a troublesome past.

In a situation like this, are you required to release any information over the phone? does it matter which authority calls? and how would you verify it?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #2  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

You are not required to release any such information.

If a proper authority requires that information they'll do so in person, with a subpoena.

If he calls again tell him that there are a lot of jerks who live or work in Newport Beach and a lot more who can claim over the phone to do so. Then hang up.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #3  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Tell him to shove it. Nothing MUST be released over the phone. If he was an actual offical (a lawyer is not an offical) with serious business, he would come in person with a court order.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #4  
The Gasman's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Default

You are not required to answer anything over the phone, and could actually be liable if he is a fraud and you get someone in trouble.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:40 AM
  #5  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Yeah that's bullshit.

In your shoes I would release nothing. He's trying to strong-arm you and all you have to do is politely indicate that as a result of your corporate privacy policy you will not be releasing any information to him without court-order. (or written permission from the person whose information you would be releasing).

If they won't stop and claim they have the authority, ask them to prove it by means of some sort of document indicating they have the right to obtain this information.

Stand strong man.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #6  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by s2000raj,Oct 23 2007, 01:37 PM
You are not required to answer anything over the phone, and could actually be liable if he is a fraud and you get someone in trouble.
^ Very true!

Different privacy legislation in different geographical areas and industries, but you will never get in trouble for erring on the side of caution.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
Amit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
From: Monteagle, TN
Default

yeah I know he was just trying to strong arm me to get a hold of this person. I told him to take a hike politely. I was just curious of a different type of authority were to ever call, would I have to release any information. You guys have clearly answered that question. Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #8  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

unless his name is vinny or guido and he has a jersey accent, you're pretty safe to ignore this guy.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #9  
got_torque?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: biloxi, MS
Default

privacy act of 1974

but thats with goverment agencies.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 03:36 PM
  #10  
5 Speed AP2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by magician,Oct 23 2007, 10:21 AM
If a proper authority requires that information they'll do so in person, with a subpoena.
Word. Just like there are legal procedures to filing suit against someone, there are legal procedures when investigating.
Lawyers call us frequently hoping to make us think we're backed into a corner and squeezing any info from us.
Even the acknowledge of someone/something could be a lead to them that could get you in deep waters.
Whenever you or your affiliates are in litigation always keep those lips shut and make the opposing side work for it legally.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Incubus
Off-topic Talk
13
Feb 8, 2009 06:42 PM
rapid1der
Off-topic Talk
12
Nov 13, 2006 11:40 PM
Wisconsin S2k
Off-topic Talk
14
Jan 9, 2005 04:33 PM
Schatten
Off-topic Talk
13
Nov 23, 2001 06:16 PM
Schatten
Off-topic Talk
4
Oct 2, 2001 03:03 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM.