View Poll Results: Shall DaRKCrow keep his SIG pics? POLL!

YES! DaRKCrow keep all his Sig ^ ^V

50.38%

NO! DaRKCrow will keep his Sig empty >=I

26.32%

Dont care, DaRKCrow will do whatevers and not effecting you at all ^ ^ d

23.31%

Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

Shall DaRKCrow keep his SIG pics? POLL!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:02 AM

#21

DaRKCrow

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 4,929

Likes: 0

From: t(-_-*t) (i"-_-)i

Interesting........I already press the pics to the minimum sized.

DaRKCrow
"I think I am gonna keep like 3 pics max

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:08 AM

#22

shamma1977

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 361

Likes: 2

From: Houston

Quote:

Originally posted by DaRKCrow
Its the content...I kept mine all in thumbnail sized.....

DaRKCrow

I just assumed it was bandwidth (even though it was never a problem for me thanks to cable modem at home) since content was cool by me. However I did think that there were too many little pics as I mentioned previously, too many that I couldn't clearly make out any details. I do wear glasses though (terrible vision!) as I am near sited

, so maybe its my own problem.

(I also have a pair of presciption sun shades, so I can look like this --------->

)

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:16 AM

#23

DaRKCrow

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 4,929

Likes: 0

From: t(-_-*t) (i"-_-)i

Bwahahahaa, nice!

These are my shades....

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:19 AM

#24

S2R

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 3,477

Likes: 0

From: jimisapostwhore

Most people just put whatever they want in the sig, so I don't think it's a big deal. If people don't like sigs then there is the option to turn them off. Also, those that don't like avatars can turn those off too. I find it hard to believe that DC's sigs were offensive considering the pics and contents in other threads. Heck there are pics on this board of see through panties and tops, so that booty pic is pretty mild relatively speaking. Also, there are many people who have a string of little pics in their sigs, so I don't think that's an issue either.

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:20 AM

#25

S2R

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 3,477

Likes: 0

From: jimisapostwhore

Quote:

Originally posted by DaRKCrow
Bwahahahaa, nice!

These are my shades....

Haha that's my naughty spark plug.

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:23 AM

#26

DaRKCrow

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 4,929

Likes: 0

From: t(-_-*t) (i"-_-)i

John, those plug are really rusted...its crazy...the other ones were fine, you know what happened? BTW< whats the update on the warranty?

DaRKCrow
"Wanna hang out sometime? Call me up dude!"

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:27 AM

#27

Schatten

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 6,936

Likes: 2

From: Austin

difficult to find your sig impairing. I usually complain bout large images in sigs - mainly because individuals pick whatever is out there / do not know how to edit images / do not have any concept of size in KB. there are a few out there, one just under 500KB, and another just under 900KB - that's almost a MEG! in just a sig. your pictures aren't that large - doesn't bother me one bit.

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:31 AM

#28

AnDy_PaNdY

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2001

Posts: 10,655

Likes: 0

From: stafford

The sig was certainly not offensive to me in any way.
As I am on a cable modem, speed is not impared either.
Some people have great sig's so I say keep em, people have the option to turn them off, so whats the problem

Nov 21, 2001 | 09:41 AM

#29

Bruinlax

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2001

Posts: 291

Likes: 0

From: San Francisco

It wasn't offensive, but your sig certainly made it difficult to catch a glimpse of s2ki at work. - i would have to scroll the screen once your posts were there. - so now i can read all you have to say.