Spanking May Lower Kids' IQs
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Sep 25 2009, 06:23 AM
If your opinion was mute, you'd have never given it.
FYI, it's subjunctive.
(Sorry, Jon: hard to resist when you lob them over the plate like that, fat and slow.
)
When my wife read me the headline a couple of days ago, my first question was whether the researchers got the cause-effect relationship in the proper order: maybe stupid kids get spanked more because they're stupid.
Just another case of someone wanting a practice to change so they set out to do a baloney study to make an argument for it.
There is no way whacking a kid on the butt when he starts eating the impulse candy bars at the checkout lane of the grocery store has a permanent impact on his or her intelligence.
I took one college entrance exam and the score I got qualifies for entrance into Mensa. My parents whacked me with a belt when I acted like a turd. So I suppose that scientifically proves that either hitting kids with a belt makes them smarter, or Mensa really needs to improve their standards for admission.
There is no way whacking a kid on the butt when he starts eating the impulse candy bars at the checkout lane of the grocery store has a permanent impact on his or her intelligence.
I took one college entrance exam and the score I got qualifies for entrance into Mensa. My parents whacked me with a belt when I acted like a turd. So I suppose that scientifically proves that either hitting kids with a belt makes them smarter, or Mensa really needs to improve their standards for admission.
Originally Posted by magician,Sep 25 2009, 07:19 AM
When my wife read me the headline a couple of days ago, my first question was whether the researchers got the cause-effect relationship in the proper order: maybe stupid kids get spanked more because they're stupid.
I could see thatas far as spelling: duz it giv u a headake wen I spell rong? I don't understand why everyone feels the need to nitpick at grammar, when the point was likely understood.








