Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

TL-S dyno?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 08:20 AM
  #1  
shingles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land
Default TL-S dyno?

Does anyone know what the average TL-S dyno to the wheel is? I've got some guy saying it only dyno's 200 at the wheel?

I think the regular ones might, but the TLS?

-Shing
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 10:26 AM
  #2  
VTEC Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 1
From: South Orange County, CA
Default

It's not unusual to see a 3.2 TypeS dyno around only 200hp at the wheels. Reason for this being is because the TypeS models have an advanced 2-stage intake manifold. The car is already not making it's max potential power by just sitting their still with one of the intake manifolds open, but when the RPMS climb and it's time for the second manifold to kick in, nothing happens because it's still not getting any air in. One of the biggest things that give the TypeS models more power over the base models is the 2-stage intake manifold. So I'm guessing that when the car is actually moving, that it would be making about 230-235 at the wheels. The only true way to be able to see how much a TypeS is making at the wheels is if you have a fan blowing cold air into the engine bay with the fan increasing speed as the revs climb.

TypeS in no way should ever be underestimated. I believe that if both an S2000 and a TypeS just floor it off the line (S2000 not peeling out), the S2000 will have a hard time passing it.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
Eze8199's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

Originally posted by VTEC Racer


TypeS in no way should ever be underestimated. I believe that if both an S2000 and a TypeS just floor it off the line (S2000 not peeling out), the S2000 will have a hard time passing it.

I don't think the type S is that fast, is it?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
shingles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land
Default

Originally posted by Eze8199



I don't think the type S is that fast, is it?
Plenty fast: standing quarter in roughly 14.8... seems faster than most poorly driven stooks.

-Shing
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2001 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
dsp's Avatar
dsp
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally posted by shingles


Plenty fast: standing quarter in roughly 14.8... seems faster than most poorly driven stooks.

-Shing
My roommate has a CL-S (same engine as TL-S). It is much quicker than I expected, especially at highway speeds. Not as fast as my S2k, but...

Because of its torquey V-6, in a rolling start I think it would stay in front of us at least until we're through 2nd gear, long enough to consider it a "win".

In general, my recommendation would be don't get caught in the wrong gear against a CL/TL-S.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 06:19 AM
  #6  
FlyingPig's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: USR, NJ
Default

Let me go dig it out.
I have a TL-S with CAI.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 06:25 AM
  #7  
FlyingPig's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: USR, NJ
Default

25% lose at the wheel is not uncommon at all.

Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 06:32 AM
  #8  
FlyingPig's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: USR, NJ
Default

If you nail it from idle, TL-S will win out even if the stook shifts perfect (what are the chances?).
On a 20 MPH rolling start, stook kicks TL-S's ass every single time.
I bet a 7000 RPM done right will nail TL-S as well. (haven't tried)

Originally posted by Eze8199



I don't think the type S is that fast, is it?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 11:03 AM
  #9  
dsp's Avatar
dsp
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally posted by FlyingPig
25% lose at the wheel is not uncommon at all.
maybe 25% because of the slushbox?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2001 | 11:09 AM
  #10  
FlyingPig's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: USR, NJ
Default

Originally posted by dsp


maybe 25% because of the slushbox?
beats me....not that I care......
If I really want to, I can wait for the 6 speed, transfer the CAI and install the comptech headers. That will produce over 300 HP at the crank.
But, what's the point? It will still be FWD and it will still be a big boat. It's a great family car that provide a little fun. I'll take it for what it is.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
S2K1
The Corner
27
Apr 22, 2004 10:01 AM
revto9k
Off-topic Talk
2
Apr 5, 2004 07:28 AM
Phantom
Off-topic Talk
24
Aug 21, 2002 12:26 AM
stockae92
Off-topic Talk
3
Nov 12, 2001 01:21 PM
tommyg
Off-topic Talk
3
Jun 14, 2001 02:04 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 AM.