Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

What kind of .45 should I get (Part II)?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 09:24 PM
  #21  
seung's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 2
From: omotesando
Default

how much are desert eagles?
can i even get them ligally?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 09:26 PM
  #22  
seung's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 2
From: omotesando
Default

i just wanna get a gun for the "look" of it.
i like guns' color, weight and texture.
if i actually get one, i'm going to modify it (like pour cement in it. haha) so that it wouldn't actually shoot bullets.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 09:30 PM
  #23  
S2KFanatic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Shawnee KS USA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by loki
[B]Cars kill alot of people as well, intentionally and unintentionally... I say we start a ban again those 4wheel heathens right now... and let's throw anything that's sharp and pointy in the mix too.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 09:33 PM
  #24  
PR151's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by naishou
[B]Using guns.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 09:53 PM
  #25  
mingster's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

Sig & Sauer P220 .45

'nuf said
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 10:45 PM
  #26  
ironwedge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage
Default



I've been really happy with my USP although I'd like to have the compact frame. The full size frame is a bit too large to conceal. While not a .45, the Glock model 23C (compensated) is worth a look for a carry weapon.

Also, to reply to a few folks above:

Guns don't kill people, Bullets do.

The best thermonuclear device right now (for concealed carry) has to be the Nuke .50, "micro" nuclear .50 cal round. Available from Birdman Weapons Systems http://www.birdman.org/products/Nuke50.htm

Also, whoever that was wanting to fill a handgun with cement...Darwin would approve! Brandish a hangun because you think it looks cool (even a fake) prepare to go to the hospital.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2002 | 12:54 AM
  #27  
naishou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,936
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Default

Originally posted by Guntersmurf
I would much rather live in a society where I knew everyone was armed than a society where only the criminals were armed.
I wouldn't. It just encourages the criminals to use their arms because they assume their intended victim might shoot them otherwise. Shoot or be shot. Ever hear of the arms race? Guns beget guns. I don't see it as a solution but part of the problem. You live in a society where everyone is armed and the incidence of gun related death is very high (among the highest in the world). I live in a society where only a minority of criminals (and the police) are armed and the incidence of gun related death is among the lowest in the world. I can't help thinking there is a link. We have very tight gun laws and as a result our incidence of violent crime and accidental death is orders of magnitude lower than in the USA. Oh yes, knives (of certain kinds) are banned here too. Sound terrible to you? Why? I can't understand the argument that says that having more weapons makes things safer Your logic seems to be "if criminals have guns, I need one too" and my logic is "if criminals have guns, we need to take them away".

Cars kill people. True. But is it their design intent or do they have another purpose? Do guns have a purpose other than killing people? I believe not.

So you have guns to fire at a range because it gives you a rush. Why? What prehistoric urges are responsible for that and is it something that we should be comfortable with? This is aside from the small minority who are true sporting shooters. Using phrases like "deadly accuracy" loosely reveals a lot about the true reason people like guns and it's a pretty scary reality. If it wasn't a deadly weapon would you be so fascinated by it? Why don't you fire water pistols? It would be more fun.

The only way this thread is going to get locked is if it gets personal. I haven't attacked any of you and don't intend to. If you do the same we'll be fine. Telling me to lighten up is pretty ironic because I'm not the one getting upset Keep it civil and the debate is worth having. ElTianti is one who knows how to argue hard without getting personal and knows the difference between philosophical argument and personal attack. I'm surprised he hasn't commented.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2002 | 03:04 AM
  #28  
rstark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

Originally posted by naishou
The only way this thread is going to get locked is if it gets personal.
WRONG! Bringing up the political aspect of guns will close this thread also. Why are people posting about whether or not it's right to own a gun and the intent of its use? I think you need to read the thread subject one more time.

Back to the thread, since I've shot over a dozen different pistols in various calibers, I prefer the 1911 style the best. The grips on a Glock are too fat for my taste and prefer a single stack magazine versus a double stack. Kimbers are great and very accurate out of the box and can be had for around $600.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2002 | 04:08 AM
  #29  
ElTianti's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Rome, GA
Default

"What we can say with some confidence is that allowing more people to carry guns does not cause an increase in crime. In Florida, where 315,000 permits have been issued, there are only five known instances of violent gun crime by a person with a permit. This makes a permit-holding Floridian the cream of the crop of law-abiding citizens, 840 times less likely to commit a violent firearm crime than a randomly selected Floridian without a permit."
"More Permits Mean Less Crime..." Los Angeles Times, Feb. 19, 1996, Monday, p. B-5

Hmmm....
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2002 | 04:29 AM
  #30  
Shank Flanker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Burke Centre
Default

Ey Naishou... read this: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=21902
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 AM.