who is the bigger celeb
I think actors are bigger in general [more press, more money], but musicians have a better chance of transcending pop culture and entering social consciousness.
Everybody will remember and probably still listen to Michael Jackson,The Beatles, Nirvana, Metallica, etc. in 20 years because they changed the landscape of music, but very few movies and actors have really changed and influenced movies to the same degree. And those that have, don't seem to get the regard.
Everybody will remember and probably still listen to Michael Jackson,The Beatles, Nirvana, Metallica, etc. in 20 years because they changed the landscape of music, but very few movies and actors have really changed and influenced movies to the same degree. And those that have, don't seem to get the regard.
Originally Posted by Angelus1243,Feb 28 2008, 08:14 PM
I think actors are bigger in general [more press, more money], but musicians have a better chance of transcending pop culture and entering social consciousness.
Everybody will remember and probably still listen to Michael Jackson,The Beatles, Nirvana, Metallica, etc. in 20 years because they changed the landscape of music, but very few movies and actors have really changed and influenced movies to the same degree. And those that have, don't seem to get the regard.
Everybody will remember and probably still listen to Michael Jackson,The Beatles, Nirvana, Metallica, etc. in 20 years because they changed the landscape of music, but very few movies and actors have really changed and influenced movies to the same degree. And those that have, don't seem to get the regard.
Actors are more visual and you know what they all look like. Musicians are sold on how they sound, not necessarily how they look. Ergo, chances are that an actor is more easily recognized on the street and therefore is a bigger "celebrity" to Joe Blow walking down the street.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










