Photography and Videography Tips, techniques and equipment for taking great photographs and videos. Come here for advice and critique on your photos and videos. To show off your S2000 go to The Gallery

Example of Simple Post Process

 
Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #11  
ludikris's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit, MO
Default

The two biggest differences that I see is that Honda red is now Honda burgundy and there has been a lot of noise introduced into the image. As an aside, it looks like they need a sensor cleaning as well!

A suitable edit depending on the style, but for a realistic/PJ edit, it misses the mark.
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #12  
iLuveketchup's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,907
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by ludikris,Jun 17 2007, 06:45 PM
The two biggest differences that I see is that Honda red is now Honda burgundy and there has been a lot of noise introduced into the image. As an aside, it looks like they need a sensor cleaning as well!

A suitable edit depending on the style, but for a realistic/PJ edit, it misses the mark.
What's a realistic /PJ edit? It would be great to see an example of your workflow on the same image.
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #13  
ludikris's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit, MO
Default

Originally Posted by iLuveketchup,Jun 17 2007, 09:02 PM
What's a realistic /PJ edit? It would be great to see an example of your workflow on the same image.
PJ (Photojournalism) editing is extermely limited and sometime nonexistant. a 'Realistic' edit would be something that reflected the actual moment of time, not as modified via PS.

If the goal was to go for a pleasing transformation of the image (punching up the color, contrast, etc) then it's there. I just noticed the colors being off as well as the noise. Since I shoot drag racers of many different colors, I have to remember the exact color of that car and thus, it's one of the first things that I noticed. I'm not saying the edit is bad, those two items just happen to be what I spend alot of time on.

Shoot me a full size JPEG or RAW file (importable into CS2) and I'll edit it after I return from shooting clubs in Austin later in the week.
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 02:40 AM
  #14  
iLuveketchup's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,907
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by ludikris,Jun 17 2007, 08:02 PM
Shoot me a full size JPEG or RAW file (importable into CS2) and I'll edit it after I return from shooting clubs in Austin later in the week.
Dude.. that's the whole point. I was using the 164Kb file shown above. If I were given a RAW file, the colors would have been better.
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 07:16 AM
  #15  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

Good tutorial.

I didn't like the oversaturated original colors. Too much nuclear-glow on monitor. The Honda sign's white-area darkening is a personal choice but I liked the play of the original against the car. Makes the eye move a little more. Depends on what you want the image to say. I tend to add a gradient-masked blur, matching up to distance, to the background in addition to subtle darkening to make foregrounds pop.
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 09:21 AM
  #16  
ludikris's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit, MO
Default

Originally Posted by iLuveketchup,Jun 18 2007, 04:40 AM
Dude.. that's the whole point. I was using the 164Kb file shown above. If I were given a RAW file, the colors would have been better.
ok, and my point is that the colors are more accurate in the original file. The noise is also a by-product of the edit.

The end game is this: Why mess with a partial file?
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #17  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

I like the colors in the PP'd photo better on my calibrated monitor, and I like the non-PP'd colors better on my non-calibrated monitor.....go figure.
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #18  
nibble's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,206
Likes: 15
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

because I $$ck at it and he wanted to help me.
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #19  
wilch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Default

Great thread.

I much prefer the post processed image. It "draws the eye" more.
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #20  
oss's Avatar
oss
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Default

[QUOTE=iLuveketchup,Jun 17 2007, 11:19 PM]Thanks for the comments guys!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM.