S2000 Electronics Information and discussion related to S2000 electronics such as ICE, GPS, and alarms.

---------> Please don't post incorrect "facts"

Old Mar 23, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #31  
PJK3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

also, there's a lot of stuff in that FAQ that really just needs to be retired (simply due to the FAQ's age).


i'd love to endeavor the whole rewrite personally, but i know it can't happen. however, give me some sections that lean towards my abilities, and i'll make time to do it. i'm sure i could probably write up (or dig up an old thread) on a number of topics. i know i already have a good chunk in the current FAQ, and a section on demo'ing equipment (that should be updated).
oh, and be sure to give me some reasonable deadlines too, or it might fall into the wrong inbox by accident. seriously tho, a target date would help me budget time to do it.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #32  
SilverstoneS2k_FL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Default

Badges are a bad idea. They are too easy to copy.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #33  
darkknight1999's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,288
Likes: 0
From: Hopedale, MA
Default

Is that how you got yours?

We can just have a list at the top of the FAQ thread that lists' those that can be trusted for info. That thread will be lock so no one can just add themselves.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #34  
SilverstoneS2k_FL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Default

I put it there for an example.... I knew someone would notice....
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #35  
PJK3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

even if put in there on your own, it is definitely not in the same location as the normal badges... the sig images have a notably different location.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 02:27 PM
  #36  
b0mbrman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
From: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Default

Got it
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 06:54 AM
  #37  
PJK3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

*does doubletake*

whoa. hey hey b-man!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #38  
b0mbrman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
From: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Default

What's up?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #39  
PJK3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

got bored at work, and mildy motivated --

i wrote up an 'update' to the FAQ. a version 2 as it were. it's mostly just a modified, edited, enhanced, version of Mario's.


https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=295344
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #40  
JohnR_in_la's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark, CA
Default

How about all those ridiculously thick and expensive cables you installers use

They are basically audio jewelry, theres no need to spend all that money on completely passive hunks of metal, electrons flow every bit as good through "cheap" cable, as long as the gauge and any shielding requirements are met. Wire was perfected fine 1/2 a century ago, for audio frequency transmissions.

All thos buzz words, "zero oxygen", etc, just dont matter.

Doubling or tripling the specification requirements for a certain type of cable that goes x feet, does nothing to improve audio quality. It either meets specifications, or it doesnt . If your speaker is x feet from the amp, the speaker cable needs to be x ga, etc.

It is nice to have good solid bindings and connectors between equipment, since its in a car and all ... but you dont have to spend 50 bucks on a Monster RCA cable to get that.

-----------
Im not picking on anyone in paticular, but since the subject of truth was raised, I figured I would take a stab at over-spec-ed, expensive audio cables..
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 AM.