New Flash Pro User
Originally Posted by alSpeed2k,Jan 12 2010, 01:29 PM
^The most dramatic change seems to be the 60-80 run. Is the testpipe 63mm or 70mm? Did you do a 60-80 run totally stock?
Originally Posted by gernby,Jan 12 2010, 12:57 PM
I'm all for real world tests, but I'd like to know more about how the 60-80 tests were done. Were they done on the same day from the same exact spot on the same road in the same direction with the same amount of weight (and gasoline) with the wind speed and direction the same and with the top in the same position (up or down)?
It was done on the same road. I used the gtech to measure it as that is the instrument used on both occassion. It measure 1/4, 0-60, 0-70, 0-80, 30-50, 50-70, etc...Gas was about the same. It was done on different days so yes the result will be different. Temp was off as well. I'm just stating the data and I know there are a lot of variables in the equation. I'm just using it as information, nothing more and nothing less. Take it for what its worth
I understand that you are just reporting the info. However, I don't think it would be possible for an intake and tune to genete an extra 25 ft-lbs across the whole 60-80 MPH range, which is what I think would be required to reduce the accelleration time that much.
Originally Posted by alSpeed2k,Jan 12 2010, 02:11 PM
I'm not surprised by the improvement b/c the Hondata is supposed to help out the most in the mid-range. What was stock 60-80 crazysupratt?
as far as test pipe goes, i have a 70mm
Originally Posted by alSpeed2k,Jan 12 2010, 02:11 PM
I'm not surprised by the improvement b/c the Hondata is supposed to help out the most in the mid-range. What was stock 60-80 crazysupratt?
i did find my runs when I had my ap1 with test pipe and intake though

ill see about uploading them
Originally Posted by gernby,Jan 12 2010, 01:20 PM
I understand that you are just reporting the info. However, I don't think it would be possible for an intake and tune to genete an extra 25 ft-lbs across the whole 60-80 MPH range, which is what I think would be required to reduce the accelleration time that much.
With the latest info on which A/F reading to use in FlashPro, I have reverted back to using the A:F instead of the A:F corrected to tune the car. I loaded back the injen calibration and start the WOT tunning. I think I am happy from 5200-8500 tune. I just need to work on 4k to 5k range to flatten it out a bit.


I notice that around 3500- 3900 RPM it goes lean and also around 4900 - 5300 RPM.
I'm wondering if I put some 100 octane in the car and advance timing a little bit, would it be beneficial. Of course I will do this on the dyno first.
Anyways, if you guys have maps, post them up.
I'm wondering if I put some 100 octane in the car and advance timing a little bit, would it be beneficial. Of course I will do this on the dyno first.
Anyways, if you guys have maps, post them up.






