S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

521whp stock engine

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #21  
bobmoheb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

to be safe with the 9psi i think you would deffinitly want stand alone engine management.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #22  
bobmoheb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

is going with a thicker gasket just as safe for your motor as building the bottom end and if not how much worse is it for your engine.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #23  
eniety's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Dryden
Default

Originally Posted by bobmoheb,Jan 26 2005, 03:31 PM
to be safe with the 9psi i think you would deffinitly want stand alone engine management.
Feel like providing any details on why you say this?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #24  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

Originally Posted by bobmoheb,Jan 26 2005, 02:31 PM
to be safe with the 9psi i think you would deffinitly want stand alone engine management.
I ran 9 psi with water injection for over a year with an every day drive and never had any problrms.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #25  
JDMKID35's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
From: BOWIE
Default

I told ppl but car made power but no one wanted to belive me that it was on a stock motor now you can see !!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #26  
eniety's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Dryden
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Jan 26 2005, 07:08 PM
I ran 9 psi with water injection for over a year with an every day drive and never had any problrms.
What made you decide to run water injection?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #27  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

9 psi
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #28  
eniety's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Dryden
Default

The UR intercooler wasn't efficient enough?

Any idea how much cooler your intake temp was after injection in comparison to solely intercooled?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #29  
S2KEvolution's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

Originally Posted by eniety,Jan 26 2005, 03:10 PM
Feel like providing any details on why you say this?
running 9psi with a stock headgasket vs. running 9psi with a thicker headgasket...
your gonna need to tune it pretty well to run the stock head gasket with 9psi... in order to run it with no problems. more boost with stock compression? I'd assume get a thicker headgasket just to be safe.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #30  
03spa's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: holbrook
Default

I am going to sound ignorant here, but 3mm head gasket, or roughly 0.077 inches will decrease compression from 11 to 8.5?

Does the install need anything special done to the head or block to accept the stainless steel gasket? Or do you just use regular headgasket sealer?

Also, how does this change effect the cams, and timing chain?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 AM.