S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Berk Header: in search of 600whp

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:02 PM
  #11  
ILoveMYHonda1984's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by m R g S r,Dec 23 2010, 07:53 PM
awesome job man! thats very nice for a 1500 blower on this motor!

but its crazy the difference in boost it takes on the same blower to make that kind of HP. i just bought a 1500 for my vette, and the kid who had it on before me made 684whp with it, running a lot less than 25lbs.

i remember scott mentioning something about stalling the blower, are you having any issues with it right now? i think the blower/setup still has some HP left in it, it just has to be freed up! looks like you're on the right track!
Haha, you're also working with more than double the displacement and twice the cylinders. All in good fun. The blower still seems to be making power well. I have not noticed any stalling, still seeing good gains out of each RPM increment. Jimmy at Paxton agrees Im still in the efficiency range, although the top of it.

Yeah Scott and I are working on fine tuning other areas for that last bit. AP1 intake cam, larger TB, SP exhaust cutout, "reworked" have to wait to see this one intake mani, aftercooler, and maybe a new collector etc.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #12  
ILoveMYHonda1984's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by m R g S r,Dec 23 2010, 07:58 PM
I kind of disagree with this slightly.

the correct way would be to have the setup tuned to its maximum potential with the current combination of parts, THEN re tune the new setup with the new combination of parts so it is running optimally.

That would give you a true comparison when swapping out just a single item.

bad tune with one header vs. a good tune with a different header isn't a fair comparison.

good tune on both is a fair assessment of the power gained by just swapping the header.
Ill agree with this. Just didnt want people to think we were sand bagging to show false gains with one header over the other. If anything, in this case the T1R was at advantage of the better tune. The Berk was just "added" and not tuned to its full potential yet.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #13  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by m R g S r,Dec 23 2010, 07:58 PM
I kind of disagree with this slightly.

the correct way would be to have the setup tuned to its maximum potential with the current combination of parts, THEN re tune the new setup with the new combination of parts so it is running optimally.

That would give you a true comparison when swapping out just a single item.

bad tune with one header vs. a good tune with a different header isn't a fair comparison.

good tune on both is a fair assessment of the power gained by just swapping the header.
I agree with you. But what I go by and maybe what he was as well, was that if the afr goes lean then you know its breathing better and therefore before the tune you know its going to deliver. A component added to the motor that leans out the afr is a sure indication of breathing/power improvement tuned or not.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #14  
ILoveMYHonda1984's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Dec 23 2010, 07:15 PM
So what gains were made with the T1R over OEM?

And someone needs to update there power chart. Sideways is going to be pissed
I dont have this info anymore. I installed this header back in 09 and dont have a test like the one performed here to show results. I wish I could have tested all three on that last dyno day
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #15  
m R g S r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by ILoveMYHonda1984,Dec 23 2010, 08:05 PM
Ill agree with this. Just didnt want people to think we were sand bagging to show false gains with one header over the other. If anything, in this case the T1R was at advantage of the better tune. The Berk was just "added" and not tuned to its full potential yet.
hey if you know that it is an improvement and were dynoing the two just to help people out, more power to you. if the haters want to hate and call BS, f them! lol

so did you retune yet? or you're waiting for the other stuff to be completed then retune?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #16  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by ILoveMYHonda1984,Dec 23 2010, 08:02 PM
Haha, you're also working with more than double the displacement and twice the cylinders. All in good fun. The blower still seems to be making power well. I have not noticed any stalling, still seeing good gains out of each RPM increment. Jimmy at Paxton agrees Im still in the efficiency range, although the top of it.

Yeah Scott and I are working on fine tuning other areas for that last bit. AP1 intake cam, larger TB, SP exhaust cutout, "reworked" have to wait to see this one intake mani, aftercooler, and maybe a new collector etc.
Yeah I imagine your effectively trying to produce the cfm breathing capability of your 4 banger to mimic the breathing of a v8... and doing quite well I might add. This blower on any other factory 4 banger just wouldn't produce.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #17  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by ILoveMYHonda1984,Dec 23 2010, 10:02 PM
AP1 intake cam
I have a set of AP1 cams I'd let you have for cheap.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:24 PM
  #18  
ILoveMYHonda1984's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

I have a set of cams out of Scotts car but I thank you.

Haters are going to hate, thats for sure. Everyone has something they are interested in and some cant see past that to appreciate the work of others.

I alluded to some of the other winter plans for the car "AP1 intake cam, larger TB, SP exhaust cutout, "reworked" have to wait to see this one intake mani, aftercooler, and maybe a new collector etc. "

There will be a retune in the near future. I can only imagine it will be performed by Scott and I. May be in conjunction with Chad as well. We like using their shop.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:56 PM
  #19  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Who's hating anyway?

560whp+ SC
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 08:05 PM
  #20  
JawKnee's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 1
From: Newcastle, WA
Default

Any chance we can see from 4k+, instead of 5.7k+?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:53 PM.