Borg Warner s366
The 6262 seemed to be the same physical size as the 35r when I compared the two. A local shop told me the 6262 and 6265 are physically the same size as well. So you should not have any sort of fitment issues.
Martin
Martin
Originally Posted by Shftat9k,Dec 7 2009, 02:56 PM
6265 is your turbo then. It will have a much fatter power band then the BW. Fernando@CFT has hit over 800whp with it. Maybe like a 500-800rpm spool increase over your 35r. This is more of a guess though.
Martin
Martin
hmmm
personally i think his dyno reads a little high, but i don't want to start anthing
the 6262 is only rated to around 670hp:
http://www.xenocron.com/precision-bi...rbo-p-501.html
but with a very efficient setup such as the f20/f22 with a good manifold/piping/intercooler, a lot of power is possible.
the 6262 is only rated to around 670hp:http://www.xenocron.com/precision-bi...rbo-p-501.html
but with a very efficient setup such as the f20/f22 with a good manifold/piping/intercooler, a lot of power is possible.
yeah what dyno? when you get into high numbers like that, a high reading dyno (by a %) will skew the numbers.
i'm not saying that precision's listed rating isn't false, i'm just saying, don't always trust dyno numbers, they could be inflated.
i'm not saying that precision's listed rating isn't false, i'm just saying, don't always trust dyno numbers, they could be inflated.


