To the C++ programers here.
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: You can find me in the A
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To the C++ programers here.
There seems to be a lot of people who are having problems with finding people to accuratley tune their engines at partial throttle. In theory I would think there would be a way to take a map at WOT and some how extrapolate (maybe interpolate is a better choice) it down to create a partial throttle map in which the same A/f goals are achieved but having the system do the adjusments automatically. There would be a lot of variable like how to make the system decide to add fuel or timing based on the variable conditions that engines face. I am sure this is not a feasible project but does anyone think it possible other than me?
But I suppose that by that point you could just have engines programed into the system and tell it what a/f you want and what engine you have and it would do it for you. (add in extra info like altitude and so on) and if it hit a snag it would tell you inadequate fuel pressure to acheive desired results or that you injectors were too small bla bla bla.
But I suppose that by that point you could just have engines programed into the system and tell it what a/f you want and what engine you have and it would do it for you. (add in extra info like altitude and so on) and if it hit a snag it would tell you inadequate fuel pressure to acheive desired results or that you injectors were too small bla bla bla.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not possible. The liability reasons alone wouldn't even make some attempt to touch it. That and the fact that it's really not 100% possible
Ok, that's just a lie. It's possible for sure but it's a whole lot of work and the problem is that there just are so many factors. A good map would be needed first and minor adjustments can be made. Much like the O2 feedback option. It would also be better than a tuner since changes can be made on the fly. The only problem is that if a sensor goes bad so does the tune.
Ok, that's just a lie. It's possible for sure but it's a whole lot of work and the problem is that there just are so many factors. A good map would be needed first and minor adjustments can be made. Much like the O2 feedback option. It would also be better than a tuner since changes can be made on the fly. The only problem is that if a sensor goes bad so does the tune.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ft Collins
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for the holy grail of EMS
However the largest weakness is, it would need to have an on-board dynamometer for any instance when there is a loss of power. It doesn't help to have all the best tools for problem solving- if you can't find the problem.
However the largest weakness is, it would need to have an on-board dynamometer for any instance when there is a loss of power. It doesn't help to have all the best tools for problem solving- if you can't find the problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post