To the C++ programers here.
There seems to be a lot of people who are having problems with finding people to accuratley tune their engines at partial throttle. In theory I would think there would be a way to take a map at WOT and some how extrapolate (maybe interpolate is a better choice) it down to create a partial throttle map in which the same A/f goals are achieved but having the system do the adjusments automatically. There would be a lot of variable like how to make the system decide to add fuel or timing based on the variable conditions that engines face. I am sure this is not a feasible project but does anyone think it possible other than me?
But I suppose that by that point you could just have engines programed into the system and tell it what a/f you want and what engine you have and it would do it for you. (add in extra info like altitude and so on) and if it hit a snag it would tell you inadequate fuel pressure to acheive desired results or that you injectors were too small bla bla bla.
But I suppose that by that point you could just have engines programed into the system and tell it what a/f you want and what engine you have and it would do it for you. (add in extra info like altitude and so on) and if it hit a snag it would tell you inadequate fuel pressure to acheive desired results or that you injectors were too small bla bla bla.
Not possible. The liability reasons alone wouldn't even make some attempt to touch it. That and the fact that it's really not 100% possible 
Ok, that's just a lie. It's possible for sure but it's a whole lot of work and the problem is that there just are so many factors. A good map would be needed first and minor adjustments can be made. Much like the O2 feedback option. It would also be better than a tuner since changes can be made on the fly. The only problem is that if a sensor goes bad so does the tune.

Ok, that's just a lie. It's possible for sure but it's a whole lot of work and the problem is that there just are so many factors. A good map would be needed first and minor adjustments can be made. Much like the O2 feedback option. It would also be better than a tuner since changes can be made on the fly. The only problem is that if a sensor goes bad so does the tune.
However the largest weakness is, it would need to have an on-board dynamometer for any instance when there is a loss of power. It doesn't help to have all the best tools for problem solving- if you can't find the problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



