S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

compound turbos

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 10:37 AM
  #11  
Rugby_Guy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Is there even room for all that madness? Unless you rear mount one, I'm but sure how you'll fit everything into an already cramped engine bay
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 01:11 PM
  #12  
cmn's Avatar
cmn
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 3
From: Norway
Default

Sounds awesome! Would love to see it in an S2000!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 04:40 PM
  #13  
reysrt4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: long island
Default

a sequential is in series but with bypass valves which would add even more to the system. I would like to do the compound setup which would put the 518 as the high pressure and a larger turbo maybe a 35r with a 1.01 or similar for the lower pressure but I first have to size it right, that is why I asked for help in sizing it. also I think that if you use a 60mm wastegate for the smaller turbo and 44 for larger, than that should be good.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 12:13 PM
  #14  
B5254T4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
From: Trollywood
Default

This is a cool set up, twin 16T turbos on a Volvo 4 cylinder. Made 600+hp with great spool.

Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 01:24 PM
  #15  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

That twin turbo set up on that S looks incredible!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 04:10 AM
  #16  
Redline S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by hybrdthry911
Not sequential, compound. One turbo compressor output actually flows into the inlet of a second turbo compressor. They are not parallel but more so in series.
Ah I see. The small turbo is driven off the engine which then feeds into a larger turbo. I still don't think this would be beneficial at all. Not of a 4 cylinder anyway and with the s2k's limited space. A properly sized single will spool just fine and make all the power you need.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 03:43 PM
  #17  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Redline S2K
Originally Posted by hybrdthry911' timestamp='1379119641' post='22777412
Not sequential, compound. One turbo compressor output actually flows into the inlet of a second turbo compressor. They are not parallel but more so in series.
Ah I see. The small turbo is driven off the engine which then feeds into a larger turbo. I still don't think this would be beneficial at all. Not of a 4 cylinder anyway and with the s2k's limited space. A properly sized single will spool just fine and make all the power you need.
Need? Or want?

So you can get a 600-700whp turbo to start spooling at 2500rpm? I'd love to see that power curve out of one turbo.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 09:24 PM
  #18  
s2k manic's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 13
From: dfw
Default

compound turbo's are nice I gained 120 hp just switching from the single to the compound setup it also helped with compressor surge and egt's you would have to butcher the sh*t out of the battery area just sayin it was hard to fit two in a truck bay though there are triple turbo setups now it banana's 100+ psi I had to replace my head gasket and install h11 head studs that are torqued to 150 lbs and I only run 60 psi
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 06:03 AM
  #19  
Redline S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by Redline S2K' timestamp='1379333425' post='22780263
[quote name='hybrdthry911' timestamp='1379119641' post='22777412']
Not sequential, compound. One turbo compressor output actually flows into the inlet of a second turbo compressor. They are not parallel but more so in series.
Ah I see. The small turbo is driven off the engine which then feeds into a larger turbo. I still don't think this would be beneficial at all. Not of a 4 cylinder anyway and with the s2k's limited space. A properly sized single will spool just fine and make all the power you need.
Need? Or want?

So you can get a 600-700whp turbo to start spooling at 2500rpm? I'd love to see that power curve out of one turbo.
[/quote]Thats one way to look at it. I just don't think the benefits will out weigh the amount of work needed to fit this set up in a S. But for what its worth, this may have beneficial information to what you're looking for OP.

http://forums.evolutionm.net/evom-ne...4r-turbos.html
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 06:33 AM
  #20  
siadam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1
From: Around
Default

a 30r on this motor has been proven time and time again to make incredible power (600whp) and have amazing spool characteristics.

Just b/c you "can" do something, doesn't mean you always should. Anytime you add more complexity to a system, you add more points of failure, K.I.S.S. is a great motto to live by.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:05 AM.