S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Comptech 1/4 mile

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-07-2007, 05:41 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
PeanutButter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i ran 13.2 at 115 with my comptech supercharged at 7 psi with 4.57s, but my 60 foot was 2.4 because I was afraid to launch, i think 12s are doable
Old 09-08-2007, 09:15 AM
  #22  

 
fltsfshr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,868
Received 1,057 Likes on 540 Posts
Default

Well How did you do?

fltsfshr
Old 09-08-2007, 10:48 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
markS2kcU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default




Old 09-08-2007, 08:10 PM
  #24  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
ShocK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The F'in pulley belt was slipping like crazy, best run it got was a 14.2 lol We're gonna get his car straightened out and go for another run. I drove it once, I launched at 6k and the tires hooked hard, but I didn't slip the clutch enough and it bogged, not my car so learning to drive it, I was thinking I screwed the run completely then it hit 6k rpm and the rear end squatted hard and I was thinking ok this might be a decent run, shifted to second car fell on its face all the way to 9k, third same, 4th same, disappointing, but we'll get it fixed and get a real time. We raced on the highway going back home and my car with its mods beat him, he said the charger went to 7psi then fell to 3psi. Car ran like crap. New times to come. My car is probably good for a 13.9 at our track with its current mods. Shock
Old 09-08-2007, 08:19 PM
  #25  
Former Moderator

 
CKit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShocK,Sep 8 2007, 08:10 PM
The F'in pulley belt was slipping like crazy, best run it got was a 14.2 lol We're gonna get his car straightened out and go for another run. I drove it once, I launched at 6k and the tires hooked hard, but I didn't slip the clutch enough and it bogged, not my car so learning to drive it, I was thinking I screwed the run completely then it hit 6k rpm and the rear end squatted hard and I was thinking ok this might be a decent run, shifted to second car fell on its face all the way to 9k, third same, 4th same, disappointing, but we'll get it fixed and get a real time. We raced on the highway going back home and my car with its mods beat him, he said the charger went to 7psi then fell to 3psi. Car ran like crap. New times to come. My car is probably good for a 13.9 at our track with its current mods. Shock
So basically you're running a stock S2000 with an under the hood ornament.

Don't track the car until you get the car running smoothly. Your ECU is clearly pulling timing. You can't force it to a faster time. Check the ESM connections, they're notorious for confusing the MAP sensor if not connected well.
Old 09-08-2007, 08:27 PM
  #26  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
ShocK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^ he just fixed a wire problem with that box. And I didn't know anything about the belt until I actually ran the car or I would have never even tried, I cant believe it actually runs worse than a stock car tho haha.
Old 09-08-2007, 08:57 PM
  #27  

 
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Told you its very driver dependent
Old 09-08-2007, 09:00 PM
  #28  
Former Moderator

 
CKit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Sep 8 2007, 08:57 PM
Told you its very driver dependent
(More like tuner / installer dependent)
Old 09-09-2007, 06:21 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
BondoBuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Sep 8 2007, 08:19 PM

Your ECU is clearly pulling timing. You can't force it to a faster time. Check the ESM connections, they're notorious for confusing the MAP sensor if not connected well.
I soldered all ECU connections in July after taking my girlfriend out on two embarassing dates where we ended-up drving home in limp mode...The belt has about 1/2" of twist. I don't think I tightened it correctly when I rebuilt the car. We will get high 12's before the track closes. Never the less, I did beat a 2007 Charger and a k20 swap Civic. Trap speed was 99 mph.

What do you guys think about MAP sensor upgrades? I am thinking about switching pulleys for higher boost. What does everyone else run?
Old 09-09-2007, 06:23 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
BondoBuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Sep 8 2007, 09:00 PM
(More like...installer dependent)
I am no s2k expert..I just like to learn and have fun. Sorry.


Quick Reply: Comptech 1/4 mile



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 AM.