S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Does a Comptech SC KIt feel fast?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #201  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by 2003s2k2003,Nov 22 2009, 08:00 PM
Sweet thanks man. I think then if I just ditch my gears get maybe 700 plus a stock diff for it, with that many can get some injectors pulley and belt and a little extra to go towards an emanage. Unfortunately I am sure I will need a clutch right away with that high boost though.
12 psi should give pretty decent gains lower down I would think then. 6-7 psi at 5k would be awesome!!
Yep, and about 350whp or roughly 10psi is when you want to start thinking about a clutch upgrade but it depends on how you treat it too. An SC is easier on a clutch then a turbo but if you speed shift all the time and don't let the clutch properly engage before stabbing the gas peddle you can make it slip when otherwise not. I made about 375whp on a stock ap1 clutch with light flywheel without any slipping. Ap2 clutches dont hold as well due to the weaker pressure plate. Lots of variables

Also when you do upgrade the clutch make sure you get a 8-9lbs flywheel like a Findanza, if you want to liven up your motor throughout the entire rpm range. Well worth it.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #202  
Moddiction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Yeah I think I will try to not shift too hard when sc'd with stock clutch. Don't want to completely fry it until I have a clutch in hand and money to get it installed put aside.
Yeah I read that about AP1 clutches holding better so thats a good thing.

Is the flywheel really that big of a difference since the AP1 flywheel is already pretty light?
I had an 8 lb one on my dsm and it was definitely a nice upgrade but stock one was like 20 lbs so a much bigger difference there.
Made it almost want to stall out sometimes it seemed though. Same thing in the S?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #203  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by 2003s2k2003,Nov 22 2009, 08:41 PM
Yeah I think I will try to not shift too hard when sc'd with stock clutch. Don't want to completely fry it until I have a clutch in hand and money to get it installed put aside.
Yeah I read that about AP1 clutches holding better so thats a good thing.

Is the flywheel really that big of a difference since the AP1 flywheel is already pretty light?
I had an 8 lb one on my dsm and it was definitely a nice upgrade but stock one was like 20 lbs so a much bigger difference there.
Made it almost want to stall out sometimes it seemed though. Same thing in the S?
Yeah shedding 6 pounds is a nice noticeable difference from the ap1 flywheel. A light flywheel is not as forgiving so its possible to stall if you don't adjust your driving habits slightly, but its not hard and its well worth it to me, but I like all out performance, the way it makes the motor respond to my foot is so much more appealing as well as the additional hp/trq it frees up through the whole rpm range. Give it a little blip at the start like a high performing machine to get the rpms up and your off! If your good you don't need to blip at all, but I like to anyway

A light flywheel also increases clutch effectiveness, adds life and more holding capacity under shifting or varied throttle applications. It takes less effort for your clutch to grab/clamp and hold 8lbs of spinning inertia vs 14 or 22.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #204  
Moddiction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Yeah I guess I might as well when in there do it.
the lighter flywheel makes it feel like less power down low though correct? The heavier it it I think gives the feel of more torque starting out.
Do you have a Fidanza flywheel on yours?

Also I think I remember that adding the sc on the car increases vibrations a lot. Forgot about this. Is that true at all? If yes would stiffer motor mounts solve that issue or just have to live with it?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #205  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Lucky7s,Jun 3 2008, 07:47 AM
Unless you are talking about the Kraftwerks kit. It is linear because of the drive system being able to basically a turbo that is matched to the S2K properly.

This is the High boost dyno plotted vs. Boost (green line)



I think it is what makes it better than other kits out on the market as well as being able to just use the stock computer reflashed and bigger injectors and off you go.

If you have a 2005 or older S2K the kit for those will be released in the near future per Kraftwerks, *I know this is a bit of a shameless plug but it does show that there is a linear kit out on the market which is why I posted it*
Thats a pretty rich tune, looks like you could be getting away with another 15whp from 7.5k rpm to redline if you leaned things out a bit. You can see your hp curve drop as your afr drops. running 10.5 afr is ridiculously over rich for even a 500whp turbo car let alone a centrifugal SC. Id run that up to 12 afr up top and 12.8-2.5 pre vtec to be safe and make more power across your entire rpm range, especially on the top end where you could likely see 380whp safely.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #206  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by 2003s2k2003,Nov 22 2009, 09:24 PM
Yeah I guess I might as well when in there do it.
the lighter flywheel makes it feel like less power down low though correct? The heavier it it I think gives the feel of more torque starting out.
Do you have a Fidanza flywheel on yours?

Also I think I remember that adding the sc on the car increases vibrations a lot. Forgot about this. Is that true at all? If yes would stiffer motor mounts solve that issue or just have to live with it?
No the heaver flywheel slows the motor down and makes it feel sluggish so quite the contrary, unless you are going up a hill it will help maintain your current speed a little more but it responds less quickly to throttle application when you do need to compensate for going up a hill, not sure if I am explaining well, but there is no situation where your motor is making less power with a lighter flywheel, it makes more. Your confusing maybe the heavier flywheel being more forgiving to get going, but once the clutch is out and your moving the lighter flywheel frees up trq and hp, but it also reacts quicker to hills and what not since it doesn't have the same heavy spinning inertia to keep your engine at its current rpm without more throttle.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #207  
Moddiction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Ok yeah I know that it frees up power with the lighter flywheel, but it feels like you lose low end torque from a stop with the lighter flywheel is I guess what I meant. Thats how it felt in my dsm with 8 lb flywheel at least.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 08:57 PM
  #208  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by 2003s2k2003,Nov 22 2009, 09:48 PM
Ok yeah I know that it frees up power with the lighter flywheel, but it feels like you lose low end torque from a stop with the lighter flywheel is I guess what I meant. Thats how it felt in my dsm with 8 lb flywheel at least.
Its all about spinning inertia. Your asking more from the engine to spin 14lb vs 8lb. Its also harder to slow down 14lb vs 8lb.

Think about all the driving situations you get in, from starting out from a stop, stepping on the gas once your moving, driving up a hill, down a hill etc and ask yourself which one of these driving situations fits with the 2 things I mentioned above. Starting form a stop would be the second one for example, because this is what your car in a stopped position is trying to do, slow your motor down.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #209  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by 2003s2k2003,Nov 22 2009, 09:48 PM
Ok yeah I know that it frees up power with the lighter flywheel, but it feels like you lose low end torque from a stop with the lighter flywheel is I guess what I meant. Thats how it felt in my dsm with 8 lb flywheel at least.
Ok because at 1200rpm where you might normally let the clutch out, the lighter mass of the flywheel is not enough to store the energy required to get the car moving from a stop without slowing down the motor to stalling point, thus it requires more rpms to offset. This is not a lack of power from the motor, on the contrary, It is less rotating mass/inertia. Its the only time the added flywheel mass can be considered beneficial, but as I mentioned before, once the clutch is engaged and the car is moving it is all bliss.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 09:11 PM
  #210  
Moddiction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Ok yeah. I think whenever I do the clutch might as well put a lightweight flywheel in as well. No extra labor to do it then and should be a nice match with such a rev happy car.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 AM.