S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

FI ..now which diff

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #41  
Black Nugget's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 28,183
Likes: 0
From: local courts ...
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Aug 16 2006, 11:14 PM
Actually, using an internet based phone system, calls to Australia are dirt cheap. And you won't find better service than you will get from Differential Techniques. And shipping from Australia via FedEx isn't that much, and it only takes 3 to 4 days.
- Learn something new every day!
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #42  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Then stock clutch is the weakest point.
Honda designed it this way.

This is the same opinion Mugen has on the street version of there clutch setup
Mugen pressure plate with oem disk and a flywheel of your choice.


Now If you go to the Mugen disk then increased coefficient of friction of that material is approaching on making the diff/axels the weak point assuming the same wheel/tires combo between the two builds.
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #43  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by MugenRioS2k,Aug 17 2006, 12:00 PM
Then stock clutch is the weakest point.
Honda designed it this way.

This is the same opinion Mugen has on the street version of there clutch setup
Mugen pressure plate with oem disk and a flywheel of your choice.


Now If you go to the Mugen disk then increased coefficient of friction of that material is approaching on making the diff/axels the weak point assuming the same wheel/tires combo between the two builds.


Weakest link list:

1) Clutch
2) Tires
3) Differential
4) ?? Axles or CV joints. ??

"Driver/Owner" belongs on the list somewhere, but I'm not sure where.
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #44  
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Aug 18 2006, 05:02 AM


Weakest link list:

1) Clutch
2) Tires
3) Differential
4) ?? Axles or CV joints. ??

"Driver/Owner" belongs on the list somewhere, but I'm not sure where.

Honda should be on there too
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 05:09 PM
  #45  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

I think there is a lot of speculation (or BS) going on in this thread. In my opinion, Honda designed a super car with about 200 whp and a differential that is marginally adaquate to handle the job. You can talk all you want about "the proper way to launch your car", or "the clutch was designed to slip to save the differential", or "launch right and the stock tires will spin to save your differential", but I say bunk! The fact of the matter is that the differential was designed for a Mazda Miata and is barely adaquate for the S2000. If you launch on a regular basis with a turbo'd car, your differential will come apart sooned or later.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 07:36 AM
  #46  
ya@inlinepro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, VA
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Aug 17 2006, 05:09 PM
I think there is a lot of speculation (or BS) going on in this thread. In my opinion, Honda designed a super car with about 200 whp and a differential that is marginally adaquate to handle the job. You can talk all you want about "the proper way to launch your car", or "the clutch was designed to slip to save the differential", or "launch right and the stock tires will spin to save your differential", but I say bunk! The fact of the matter is that the differential was designed for a Mazda Miata and is barely adaquate for the S2000. If you launch on a regular basis with a turbo'd car, your differential will come apart sooned or later.
I would definately agree with everything you just said...
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 08:04 AM
  #47  
2 fast for u's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Aug 16 2006, 08:14 PM
Actually, using an internet based phone system, calls to Australia are dirt cheap. And you won't find better service than you will get from Differential Techniques. And shipping from Australia via FedEx isn't that much, and it only takes 3 to 4 days.
It was about time you chime in What is your feedback on drivability, performance etc. with your set up? Please enlighten us.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #48  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

Originally Posted by 2 fast for u,Aug 18 2006, 09:04 AM
It was about time you chime in What is your feedback on drivability, performance etc. with your set up? Please enlighten us.
All I can comment on is the differential conversion was not very difficult to do. I would say plan for a full days work if you are good at wrench turning and have a complete set of tools. The only problem I ran into was the axles from the Driveshaft Shop came without the antilock brake notches cut into them. I had to send them back for the notched to be machined in. Turnaround time was a little over a week, so good service there. I've put very few miles on the car since the new differential, as I have moved from Texas to Washington state and haven't had much time to "play" with the car. As soon as I get it registered up here, I hope to get on the drag strip. I'm not too grazy about the OS Giken 1.5 LSD I had Differential Techniques install in the Nissan pumpkin. It's makes a lot of noise compared to the ATS carbon one I had in my prior differential. I wish I had stuck with ATS.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #49  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Aug 17 2006, 08:09 PM
I think there is a lot of speculation (or BS) going on in this thread. In my opinion, Honda designed a super car with about 200 whp and a differential that is marginally adaquate to handle the job. You can talk all you want about "the proper way to launch your car", or "the clutch was designed to slip to save the differential", or "launch right and the stock tires will spin to save your differential", but I say bunk! The fact of the matter is that the differential was designed for a Mazda Miata and is barely adaquate for the S2000. If you launch on a regular basis with a turbo'd car, your differential will come apart sooned or later.
That's the dumbest post I've read here in months.

(Just one man's opinion.)
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 11:02 AM
  #50  
2 fast for u's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Aug 18 2006, 09:09 AM
All I can comment on is the differential conversion was not very difficult to do. I would say plan for a full days work if you are good at wrench turning and have a complete set of tools. The only problem I ran into was the axles from the Driveshaft Shop came without the antilock brake notches cut into them. I had to send them back for the notched to be machined in. Turnaround time was a little over a week, so good service there. I've put very few miles on the car since the new differential, as I have moved from Texas to Washington state and haven't had much time to "play" with the car. As soon as I get it registered up here, I hope to get on the drag strip. I'm not too grazy about the OS Giken 1.5 LSD I had Differential Techniques install in the Nissan pumpkin. It's makes a lot of noise compared to the ATS carbon one I had in my prior differential. I wish I had stuck with ATS.
Ok, Please keep us inform.

I appreciated it.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 PM.