S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Fuel Return system needed?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-07-2009, 08:14 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ihiryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Fuel Return system needed?

Hey guys,

I'm going to go turbo here pretty soon, waiting on my head gasket and head studs to come in (ordered this morning )!

Anyway, at about what rwhp level is a return system really needed? I've been looking around at fuel rails and it seems like the AP1 is different in design, and the AP2 vs AP2 DBW are different also.

TIA

Steve
Old 07-07-2009, 08:28 AM
  #2  
Registered User

 
JDMallmotorAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SC and NC
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is the line hose size for fuel delivery

Up to 499 HP .344
Old 07-07-2009, 08:42 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ihiryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well looking at your sig, you have an AP1, so you have a return fuel system. I'm an MY08, so I don't have a fuel return system. So what I'm asking when do I really need to move to a return fuel system.

So if I went with 1000cc injectors, F/IC, and fuel pump, what rwhp should I be safe with?

I know on the 350z, anywhere around the 500rwhp range, return fuel system is needed.
Old 07-07-2009, 08:58 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
JDMallmotorAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SC and NC
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

for a high whp car, i would think so... because you want to run 1000cc injectors, also a fuel pump would be needed to compensate for the large injectors. then With all that pressure where would the excess fuel be dump back to? when your injectors open and close.

IMO yes return fuel system would be nice. But then again their are some members on here who has an 08 that are pushing good numbers. so i hope they chim in.
Old 07-07-2009, 09:29 AM
  #5  
Registered User

 
EngineerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dodging bullets in L.A. Calif
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The correct answer is: it depends on the pump you select for your application.

Most high capacity pumps require a return line in order to prevent overheating or simply because they don't have built-in relief valves or that's just how they were designed. Pump overheating or cavitation will occur if you use a non-bypass high capacity pump that will be moving alot of volume against a semi-deadhead condition (when fuel volume from pump largely overcomes fuel demand at injectors).

If the pump has a built-in relief valve and has been designed for returnless use, then you don't need a return line.

Target horsepower dictates pump size, so you need to determine if the pump you will be using requires a return line.
Old 07-07-2009, 09:33 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
stitos2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ shore
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by EngineerX,Jul 7 2009, 12:29 PM
The correct answer is: it depends on the pump you select for your application.

Most high capacity pumps require a return line in order to prevent overheating or simply because they don't have built-in relief valves or that's just how they were designed. Pump overheating or cavitation will occur if you use a non-bypass high capacity pump that will be moving alot of volume against a semi-deadhead condition (when fuel volume from pump largely overcomes fuel demand at injectors).

If the pump has a built-in relief valve and has been designed for returnless use, then you don't need a return line.

Target horsepower dictates pump size, so you need to determine if the pump you will be using requires a return line.
I'd been wondering about that, great explanation. That's first time I actually understood what someone was talking about on whether or not you needed a return or not.
Old 07-07-2009, 09:40 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ihiryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agreed, that was an awesome explanation! I guess I'll have to do some more searching around. This is the first time I've really messed with a car without a return fuel system. So I'm assuming I couldn't get a plain Jane walboro 255 this time
Old 07-07-2009, 11:09 AM
  #8  

 
camuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

check this thread out, he did it without converting to return fuel.

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...&#entry15405385

478whp is pretty nice
Old 07-07-2009, 11:59 AM
  #9  
Registered User

 
EngineerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dodging bullets in L.A. Calif
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Walbro 255's have an internal relief valve, so they should work ok returnless.

The only problem I can see could be shortened pump life, because the pump *may* be overworking itself pumping against higher pressure all the time. But it's hard to say how much shorter life. It may even last the same! in other words - who knows
Old 07-07-2009, 01:18 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ihiryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I guess I'll have to give it a shot then. I'm going to order the walboro here pretty soon, and that was good link to that build camuman.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JUSTINTHECOASTIE
S2000 Forced Induction
24
08-09-2017 10:52 AM
Jaspah
S2000 Forced Induction
19
02-04-2017 12:12 PM
dsddcd
S2000 Forced Induction
107
01-05-2013 07:40 AM
JoeyBalls
S2000 Forced Induction
14
01-07-2011 05:13 AM
cock_diesel
S2000 Forced Induction
5
08-18-2007 01:30 PM



Quick Reply: Fuel Return system needed?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:06 PM.