S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

HKS ssqv on Comptech SC

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #11  
s2konroids's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,788
Likes: 8
From: location, location
Default

Originally Posted by RedLineS2k10
Originally Posted by teamvalorracing' timestamp='1322188945' post='21184509
Moar about the synchronic please gents. The only vid or feedback i have come across is the 9 zillon year old synapse vid on youtube.
Thanks for the responses. I appreciate your time in offering your feedback.
I currently run a synapse on mine.the response is insane. I'm not a bov geek so my knowledge is limited. But synapse bov are piston driven, meaning it doesn't use a diaphram. Synapse website is much more detailed then I am. I did post a video on YouTube of mine. Its only 10 seconds but you can see with 15-20% throttle the amount of air being pushed through the bov, and just the response time of it. Someone with bov knowledge pipe in plz
Here's a decent website for literature.
http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...ter-valve.aspx
Thanks for posting

It sounds a great product but that test etc was for turbo cars.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #12  
teamvalorracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

The only sc vid i found from them is mega old like i said. And it inly shows revving effevts. No constant throttle or anything. The synchronic and godzilla are almost exactly the same price but ill have to weld their flange to an adapter plate that i would also have to weld to the afercooler. The godzilla bolts up and then is done. Keep up the replies guys!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 05:50 PM
  #13  
RedLineS2k10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 658
Likes: 1
From: United States
Default

Lol...I'm an idiot. I'm sry I was just paying attention to the bov part. Not the use of it with a SC kit

OK, well here's a noob question for you. Is there a difference between an SC/TC application with a bov? Does the bov function different on a SC setup?

Obviously I'm unfamiliar with SC kits, but from experience synapse bovs are great on turbos lol
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 06:29 PM
  #14  
teamvalorracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Well, with the sc, it is always flowing air by rpm. It doesnt rely on load to create boost. So regardless of throttle position, the sc makes boost off the rpm you are in. So being at even 8% throttle, there will be boost essentially blowing off which wouod make the constant blow off sound the others are talking about.

The main reason i would like the upgrade over the stock bpv is mostly for aesthetics. No oerformance gains, but at the same time, i dont want any drivablity loss or loss of reliability or function.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2011 | 07:02 PM
  #15  
RedLineS2k10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 658
Likes: 1
From: United States
Default

I understand, thanks for the info. After further reading, since the synapse is a pull style bov wouldn't it be more beneficial for a supercharger? Or am I misunderstanding the dynamocs here?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ronaldng0809
S2000 Forced Induction
6
Jan 3, 2008 07:34 PM
ronaldng0809
S2000 Forced Induction
0
May 22, 2007 07:32 PM
gochuxsaurus
S2000 Forced Induction
10
Dec 3, 2005 07:18 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 AM.