S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

ID1700s Maxed Out?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 26, 2020 | 02:04 PM
  #11  
treimche's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 566
Likes: 29
From: Fort Myers, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Charper732
Post a log off your infinity. 1700s are a badass injector. 612hp could be made with id1300s. either your fuel pressure is off or they went soft as hell on your IG timing
I think I'll do that within a couple days and see if some of you guys can look at my log to see what you think. This tuner does try to stay very safe so they aren't blowing people's cars up.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2020 | 02:07 PM
  #12  
treimche's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 566
Likes: 29
From: Fort Myers, FL
Default

Originally Posted by ryiin2
Like everyone else has said, you might need to up your FP, also how are you idling what is the drivability like on the 1700s? I have heard people say it's very poor, but I also have heard it depends on your tuner.
I think the idle and drivability on the 1700s is actually very nice. Pretty impressive considering the size of the injectors.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2020 | 06:57 PM
  #13  
Charper732's Avatar
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 183
From: US129 Maryville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by treimche
ID doesn't show any injectors between the 1700 and 2600 on their website though.
Id2000s are actually 2200s.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2020 | 10:40 AM
  #14  
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by mys2k3
You can step up to ID2200cc which will idle better than the 2600’s. If you ever plan on running 93oct then the 2600’s are not recommended.
Not true. The idle and drivability is great on the 2600's, the dual slope matching makes a really big difference in this regard.

Originally Posted by riceball777
I use to have 2000cc injectors and they drove like crap. I would not recomend for a street car
Injectors are only part of the puzzle, as is the ECU, and the tuner. ID2000's can be made to drive very very well.
Originally Posted by treimche
ID doesn't show any injectors between the 1700 and 2600 on their website though.
ID2000's have been discontinued in favor of the ID2600's, they are vastly superior.

Originally Posted by treimche
I think the idle and drivability on the 1700s is actually very nice. Pretty impressive considering the size of the injectors.
Yep, the 2600's will be a little worse than the 1700's, but still very acceptable.

OP, this honestly doesn't sound far off. Your base is only 43.5 and the ID1700's only flow 6,900cc/min at that pressure. Increase the base another 20-25psi and you should have enough for 725-750whp.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2020 | 05:35 AM
  #15  
treimche's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 566
Likes: 29
From: Fort Myers, FL
Default

Originally Posted by hatrickstu
Not true. The idle and drivability is great on the 2600's, the dual slope matching makes a really big difference in this regard.


Injectors are only part of the puzzle, as is the ECU, and the tuner. ID2000's can be made to drive very very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RX1xIvOWcNk

ID2000's have been discontinued in favor of the ID2600's, they are vastly superior.


Yep, the 2600's will be a little worse than the 2600's, but still very acceptable.

OP, this honestly doesn't sound far off. Your base is only 43.5 and the ID1700's only flow 6,900cc/min at that pressure. Increase the base another 20-25psi and you should have enough for 725-750whp.
@hatrickstu thanks for all the information. I will most likely be going to a different tuner to have them see what they can get out of this thing on the current fuel system, and also tune a regular fuel map on low boost.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2020 | 02:11 PM
  #16  
F1TwoThousand's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 813
Likes: 66
Default

Classic tuner cop out. Blame fuel flow without raising fuel pressure. This is why i learned how to do everything myself.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2020 | 02:14 PM
  #17  
F1TwoThousand's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 813
Likes: 66
Default

Also love tuners that like to 'tune on the safe side' and so they stop at say 85% injector duty cycle. Its either optimized or its not.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2020 | 05:33 PM
  #18  
timg's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 35
From: Decatur, GA
Default

One thing to note- while I recommended upping the fuel pressure, you should plot the curves for your injectors and your fuel pump. Injectors flow more with more pressure. Fuel pumps flow less. At some point, they cross over. If they're closely matched, then at low fuel pressure you will be injector limited and at high pressure, you will be fuel pump limited. If you find the sweet spot, you could get 10, 20, even 30% more flow than with an un-optimized fuel pressure. To really get this right, it would be best to have a fuel pressure measurement at the fuel pump itself, but this can be inferred via line pressure drop calculations or estimates. There can be 10 psi or more line pressure drop between the pump and the injectors depending on your layout.

The earlier suggestions of a boost-a-pump help prevent fuel flow from dropping with increased fuel pressure and will increase the overall capacity of the system by allowing higher pressure + higher flow through your injectors and fuel pump.

My suggestion- these curves are all on the internet. Spend a few minutes plotting them out, doing unit conversions, and determining your limiting factor. If you're lucky, you can fix it for free by turning the FPR up. Here's an example I did for a LS engine with a Walbro 450, Walbro 525, ID 850, and ID 1050x injectors. With my existing injectors and fuel pump, ~38 psi fuel rail dP maximizes possible fuel flow (where the dark blue and dark green lines cross). With a BAP, that could increase to ~ 57 psi dP without an injector or fuel pump change.



Tim
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2020 | 04:51 AM
  #19  
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by timg
One thing to note- while I recommended upping the fuel pressure, you should plot the curves for your injectors and your fuel pump. Injectors flow more with more pressure. Fuel pumps flow less. At some point, they cross over. If they're closely matched, then at low fuel pressure you will be injector limited and at high pressure, you will be fuel pump limited. If you find the sweet spot, you could get 10, 20, even 30% more flow than with an un-optimized fuel pressure. To really get this right, it would be best to have a fuel pressure measurement at the fuel pump itself, but this can be inferred via line pressure drop calculations or estimates. There can be 10 psi or more line pressure drop between the pump and the injectors depending on your layout.

The earlier suggestions of a boost-a-pump help prevent fuel flow from dropping with increased fuel pressure and will increase the overall capacity of the system by allowing higher pressure + higher flow through your injectors and fuel pump.

My suggestion- these curves are all on the internet. Spend a few minutes plotting them out, doing unit conversions, and determining your limiting factor. If you're lucky, you can fix it for free by turning the FPR up. Here's an example I did for a LS engine with a Walbro 450, Walbro 525, ID 850, and ID 1050x injectors. With my existing injectors and fuel pump, ~38 psi fuel rail dP maximizes possible fuel flow (where the dark blue and dark green lines cross). With a BAP, that could increase to ~ 57 psi dP without an injector or fuel pump change.



Tim
This is sound advice, but one should also consider that with the increased pressure comes an increase in minimum injected fuel mass and low pulsewidth behavior. These two things are huge factors in driveability.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2020 | 04:58 AM
  #20  
treimche's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 566
Likes: 29
From: Fort Myers, FL
Default

Thanks for the suggestions again. I finally captured a log of a 3rd gear pull so I can post it here. I started in 3rd gear and hit the rolling anti lag, then let it rip through 3rd gear. Traction control was working its magic, which I'm guessing will show in the log too.

This was performed in Mexico of course

Well I guess I can't post AEM session files or data logs here since they are not supported file types

EDIT*. In my thread on the AEM forums, post #5 you can view my log and session files, if anyone would take a look and let me know what you think: https://www.aemelectronics.com/forum...-settings-help
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 PM.