ID2000 injectors idle problems
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Thats a built engine isn't it? I believe I have the record for stock engine and still living at the moment. I'm around 780 whp at 33 psi now. How in the crap did you make almost 1000 whp on only 4 more psi than I? I figured another 4 psi (37 psi) with a 6765 would probably get to around 850 whp, but my 6262 is about pooped out now at 33 psi. I may be able to squeeze another 25 whp out of it safely to get to a little over 800 whp (probably another 2-3 psi), but thats about it I think. You must be running a 42r or something then.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Thats a built engine isn't it? I believe I have the record for stock engine and still living at the moment. I'm around 780 whp at 33 psi now. How in the crap did you make almost 1000 whp on only 4 more psi than I? I figured another 4 psi (37 psi) with a 6765 would probably get to around 850 whp, but my 6262 is about pooped out now at 33 psi. I may be able to squeeze another 25 whp out of it safely to get to a little over 800 whp (probably another 2-3 psi), but thats about it I think. You must be running a 42r or something then.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Thats a built engine isn't it? I believe I have the record for stock engine and still living at the moment. I'm around 780 whp at 33 psi now. How in the crap did you make almost 1000 whp on only 4 more psi than I? I figured another 4 psi (37 psi) with a 6765 would probably get to around 850 whp, but my 6262 is about pooped out now at 33 psi. I may be able to squeeze another 25 whp out of it safely to get to a little over 800 whp (probably another 2-3 psi), but thats about it I think. You must be running a 42r or something then.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Ahhhhhh.......Gotcha. That makes more sense now.
[attachment=9801:223689_10150721998210037_816220036 _19927293_4796409_n.jpg]
[attachment=9802:261823_10150701274875037_816220036 _19668065_5479878_n.jpg]
[attachment=9803
SCF6014.JPG]You hold quite an impressive record on a stock motor then, haha. It gives me confidence to push this car harder!
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Thanks. So far so good and I plan on pushing it as far as it will go once I get the new FB Getrag trans swap in it. I'm hoping it'll make it to 900 whp with a 67 turbo and new FB twinscroll manifold. That's the next step anyway and we will see what happens. 
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
I'm not a big fan of the supra transmission because i've broken several of them. I would rather buy a dogbox, but neither really apeals to me. I've decided to use a TH350 and support 1000hp with ease!! 
Either way i'll be subscribed to see what you can do!
Either way i'll be subscribed to see what you can do!
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Still having oscillation issues with ID 2000's and kpro. It goes away when fuel is hot but I compensate by running 1350rpm and adding fuel into ect fuel compensation table so I dont get the lean oscillation swings when warming up. Going to have induction performance look at log. You can only play with phasing in kpro slightly and its not rpm dependent unles its wot. AEM has more control so easier to tune the 2000's
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 5
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by s2000442' timestamp='1316529994' post='20989155
Still having oscillation issues with ID 2000's and kpro. It goes away when fuel is hot but I compensate by running 1350rpm and adding fuel into ect fuel compensation table so I dont get the lean oscillation swings when warming up. Going to have induction performance look at log. You can only play with phasing in kpro slightly and its not rpm dependent unles its wot. AEM has more control so easier to tune the 2000's