Inlinepro Tubular Manifold
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Originally Posted by geists2k,Oct 3 2006, 05:23 PM
Dynojet.
Actually found this in my e-mail from my tuner:
As far as timing advance, we stayed around 22 - 23 degrees near rev limit on low boost (9psi) and I believe as low as 18 - 19 degrees at high boost (14psi).
Actually found this in my e-mail from my tuner:
As far as timing advance, we stayed around 22 - 23 degrees near rev limit on low boost (9psi) and I believe as low as 18 - 19 degrees at high boost (14psi).
I need to get Devin to tune mine if he is getting numbers like that.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 28,183
Likes: 0
From: local courts ...
Originally Posted by Spoolin,Oct 3 2006, 12:11 PM
It will be on a dynojet and I will post up the graph and everything.
If you do the math, it is very easy to get the numbers I am looking for. On this dyno, stock, I dyno'ed 187 whp and after the turbo at 6 psi and tuned fat and low timing I got 332 whp(BTW, this was achieved on a very hot and humid day, 92 degrees). That's a difference of 145 whp, now divide that by 6 (psi) and you get 24.2 whp per psi. Now add 4 more psi (24.2x4=96.8) and make the timing a little less conservative and A/F leaner than 11:1 and more like 11.9:1 and it should get me right where I claim; 450+ whp.
If you do the math, it is very easy to get the numbers I am looking for. On this dyno, stock, I dyno'ed 187 whp and after the turbo at 6 psi and tuned fat and low timing I got 332 whp(BTW, this was achieved on a very hot and humid day, 92 degrees). That's a difference of 145 whp, now divide that by 6 (psi) and you get 24.2 whp per psi. Now add 4 more psi (24.2x4=96.8) and make the timing a little less conservative and A/F leaner than 11:1 and more like 11.9:1 and it should get me right where I claim; 450+ whp.
However you must consider the man himself, Cody Lovefab! Click Me
Cody Lovefab... running 16psi on his turbo kit with approximately 110 octane gas put down merely 469.1 whp. Then on 13psi he was able to do 419whp.
Now, you could be saying - "We'll Cody was also using a 2mm headgasket while I am at stock compression."
That is a very good point, thank you for bringing this up!
Perhaps the additional static compression will assist you in reaching the similar horsepower range, while being 6psi less. Yet on the same note, I have a good feeling that him using the GT4088R is a major factor as well. You could be running that turbo, but reading your posts you definitely sound like you know a thing or two. If you do, you would know that having a GT4088R and only pushing 6psi is a tad bit of an overkill!
Just my input
- When looking at the dyno chart I completely over-looked the very top where it states Mustang Dyno. That could be my answer right there.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by WtbS2k,Oct 3 2006, 11:28 AM
I guess you are wrong here.
lovefab kit with stock compression at let's say 8psi will make more power than inlinepro kit with stock compression at 8 psi.
You need to do some more reading in here.
lovefab kit with stock compression at let's say 8psi will make more power than inlinepro kit with stock compression at 8 psi.
You need to do some more reading in here.
Thats what I have been trying to say to blue03s2k but instead he thinks my ability to read posts, look at dyno plots, and use the search button makes me a "know it all". Hmmmm........
Don't think so, it just makes me someone who posts logical statements instead of blind bias statements.blue03s2k I am excited you love the inlinepro set up. I love it to. I think its great. But that doesn't mean I deny the facts. Hit that search button bud....see what you find, it will amaze you!!
J. R.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Black Nugget,Oct 3 2006, 11:45 AM
Dylan,
I honestly don't think that was ever a fact that was debated. I believe that people were debating the power that is made from each kit with comparable compression and boost levels.
I honestly don't think that was ever a fact that was debated. I believe that people were debating the power that is made from each kit with comparable compression and boost levels.
J. R.
