S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

installing different head

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #21  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

To have a larger powerband. If its going to blow up at x rpms, I'm not going to rev that high, I'm trying to find out how high it is safe to rev to. If I stop making power at 9k (which I didn't), then I would stop there.

The engine was revved to 9.4k w stock ap1 head, so I was thinking that w upgraded everything in the head, I should be able to get another 1k revs without exploding?

This isn't a track car or anything, so safety/longevity is one of my top concerns, but if I can rev higher safely, why not?

I don't think I've been above 9.2 more than 5 times in the 15,000+ miles that I've been turbod and tuned, so its not like I will be bouncing off the rev limiter daily.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 11:49 AM
  #22  
siadam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1
From: Around
Default

I don't understand why people care about power dropping off. If you are making a number for example, we will use 500whp.

Let's say you make peak power at redline for this example of 8k. Say you rev it out to 9k and it starts to decrease to 475. 10k rpm and it's down to 450.

So what?

When you shift you fall back to 350whp, and build boost, and go back up to peak whp.

Making 450whp for another 1000 rpm instead of 500whp is going to be faster than shifting anytime.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 01:31 PM
  #23  
Kitesurfer s2000's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 5
From: lymington
Default

I would just love to see all the old peoples faces as they think its going to go bang, sniff miss the old sound NA made.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 06:04 PM
  #24  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by *JG*,Feb 6 2011, 10:12 AM
Just interested as to why you want to rev so high? Like stated above the power usually drops off with these motors a good bit before 10,000. No use in putting that extra stress on the engine if it stops making power at lower rpms. Ask me how I know LOL!
I killed a b2ovtec turbo car trying to rev so high a couple years ago and it was filled with supertech stuff. Although when I got all my supertech valvetrain for my S I was told 10,500 would be no problem.
I was under the impression that making more power at a higher rpm has less stress on the engine as opposed to making the same power at a lower rpm. That is, as long as the rotating assembly is properly balanced and can rev that high.

Ex.
If you make 500 peak whp at 10k rpms, you'll be making less torque than a similar setup with 500 peak whp at 9k rpms. Less torque thus less cylinder pressure and less stress.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 07:21 PM
  #25  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

Originally Posted by D1sclaimer,Feb 6 2011, 09:04 PM
I was under the impression that making more power at a higher rpm has less stress on the engine as opposed to making the same power at a lower rpm. That is, as long as the rotating assembly is properly balanced and can rev that high.

Ex.
If you make 500 peak whp at 10k rpms, you'll be making less torque than a similar setup with 500 peak whp at 9k rpms. Less torque thus less cylinder pressure and less stress.
I don't think torque is the right word in your example as torque can be derived from HP using a mathematical formula, and examining the formula shows that if HP is constant then tq will decrease as revs increase, so your example is just another way of saying that observation.

Curious about engine stress though. Interested to hear what others say.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #26  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by DFWs2k,Feb 6 2011, 10:21 PM
I don't think torque is the right word in your example as torque can be derived from HP using a mathematical formula, and examining the formula shows that if HP is constant then tq will decrease as revs increase, so your example is just another way of saying that observation.

Curious about engine stress though. Interested to hear what others say.
Did you see where I said cylinder pressure? Torque is related to cylinder pressure. Reducing torque by shifting your powerband up in the rpm range results in less cylinder pressure.
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 08:33 PM
  #27  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

do you adjust valves to same specs (lash, etc.) as stock on a built head (and being fi)?
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 05:54 AM
  #28  
Sideways's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DFWs2k
do you adjust valves to same specs (lash, etc.) as stock on a built head (and being fi)?

Yes.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 05:56 AM
  #29  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

Cool, just wanted to be sure, thank you
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 05:59 AM
  #30  
siadam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1
From: Around
Default

Of course it's "harder" on the motor revving it out. IF your worried about stress, keep it stock, lol. Otherwise, rev that bish out son!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 AM.