ITB with turbo
#31
#32
TWM induction does as well.
Tim
Tim
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i don't think they were going for a "coolness" factor by attempting ITB's on an FI setup....
i think the goal should be directed towards
-more power
-better throttle response
-better spool time (i dunno...pretty sure itb's wouldnt have anything to do with spool time because thats mostly due to the exhaust side setup...)
and so on....no about being cool
i think the goal should be directed towards
-more power
-better throttle response
-better spool time (i dunno...pretty sure itb's wouldnt have anything to do with spool time because thats mostly due to the exhaust side setup...)
and so on....no about being cool
#34
we will soon be selling our own itb set ups for f20's and bseries as well as k20 in early summer of next year we can make the same set up as in the pic just takes time
it can be tuned and yes there are alot of other factors when tuning itbs yoru tuner has to find a "happy medium"
it can be tuned and yes there are alot of other factors when tuning itbs yoru tuner has to find a "happy medium"
#35
Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Nov 29 2006, 01:34 PM
I'm not sure that there is much power to be gained by going this route. The smaller throttled volume will certainly have some effect on throttle response but unless the manifold/throttle body assembly is a better flowing design, I can't see much gains to be had.
I think a single larger throttle body and a manifold designed for FI (ie. one that sacrifices scavenging/resonance supercharging for all out flow) would be a better option. Cheaper, easier to tune, less restriction in the flow path
I think a single larger throttle body and a manifold designed for FI (ie. one that sacrifices scavenging/resonance supercharging for all out flow) would be a better option. Cheaper, easier to tune, less restriction in the flow path
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post