Mase Engineering S2000 Turbo Kit Introduction

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jul 10, 2009 | 06:47 AM

#91

MaseEngineering

Thread Starter

Banned

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 318

Likes: 0

From: Jacksonville

All PM's and emails now answered! thanks for everyones patience as we get a massive influx of questions.

Mase

Jul 10, 2009 | 07:09 AM

#92

Under_Pressure

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 300

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaseEngineering,Jul 10 2009, 06:47 AM

All PM's and emails now answered! thanks for everyones patience as we get a massive influx of questions.

Mase

FAIL!!! you missed my'n! lol See you tomm

Jul 10, 2009 | 07:15 AM

#93

TRBOKEV

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 4,712

Likes: 0

From: Phillips Ranch 909!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaseEngineering,Jul 10 2009, 06:47 AM

All PM's and emails now answered! thanks for everyones patience as we get a massive influx of questions.

Mase

Mase I never got a reply back (I'm sure you are flooded with PM's though) but I just sent you another PM.

Thanks

Jul 10, 2009 | 07:23 AM

#94

metros

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 2,104

Likes: 4

From: NoVA

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaseEngineering,Jul 10 2009, 06:43 AM

The dyno chart was for purposes to show you what this is capable of, as stated before, the kit will be released on approximately 400 whp basis. its capable of more. but with all the different circumstances, it will be limited out of the box. for safety.

The 473 pull was on about a bar of boost, on a stock ap1 engine w/ over 120,000 miles. 30r variant. The kit will be running out of the box with less boost. approximately 10 ish. if you want more power than that, then that is up to you. theres many ways to go about it. but again, the kit is designed to be 400 whp on pump 91/93.

I have an extensive amount of experience road racing FI cars. the cooling system/oil system is more needy. this front mount would be fine.

So to reliably run this on track an additional oil cooler/better radiator is recommended.

Any testing with this kit yet other than the one RHD vehicle?

Jul 10, 2009 | 07:38 AM

#95

spdracerut

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 1,593

Likes: 75

Quote:

Originally Posted by metros,Jul 10 2009, 07:23 AM

So to reliably run this on track an additional oil cooler/better radiator is recommended.

Any testing with this kit yet other than the one RHD vehicle?

Heck, to reliablely run ANY S2000, even stock, requires upgraded cooling. I think people are nuts if they think they can track a TURBO car without cooling upgrades. I wouldn't even daily drive a turbo S2k without cooling upgrades.

Jul 10, 2009 | 08:02 AM

#96

RichV

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 1,894

Likes: 0

From: High Point NC

Man, I wish that the AEM EMS was OBDII compliant!! Keeps me from using it in stupid NC! I'm stuck with the Emanage or spend a lot more with the K Pro!

Beautiful kit. I would have it if I could run it and pass inspection here!!

Jul 10, 2009 | 08:30 AM

#97

XclusiveAutosports

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 11,244

Likes: 0

From: Raleigh, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaseEngineering,Jul 10 2009, 09:45 AM

at this time, not yet. but its something we are going to look into

Thanks for the quick response. Road racing is what I am planning on building the car for (nothing competitive, just HPDEs) so what would you recommend? I love the idea of a true bolt-on kit, but I think that I might have to go with a Vmount setup. If that were the case, would you sell your kit minus the FMIC and charge piping? From looking at the pics, I'm not sure if there would be enough clearance to mount an intercooler under the hood and fit charge piping from where the compressor sits.

Jul 10, 2009 | 08:33 AM

#98

XclusiveAutosports

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 11,244

Likes: 0

From: Raleigh, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichV,Jul 10 2009, 11:02 AM

I also live in NC. I plan on swapping in an Emanage to pass inspection, and then swapping back to AEM. Sucks to need to use a piggy when you have a standalone, but as long as it can drive 20 miles without a CEL it will suffice.