S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

My Turbo S2000 Monster

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #71  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by GEARHEAD,Feb 19 2007, 11:47 PM
Hey slimjim8201,
Your powerband looks great.
How is the throttle response and power delivery when going from off-throttle to on-throttle. Is there the typical boost lag? Can you describe the lag at different rpms? I would imagine there's less lag time at higher rpms.
Thanks for your feedback.
From 2500-3000 there is about a second lag before it starts to REALLY pull. Thats to full boost. Much less time is needed to equal and destroy a stock engines output at those engine speeds. From 3,000 on up it spools very quickly. Anything from 4,000 up is more or less as fast as possible. Just floor it and its waahhhiishhhhh and you are gone.

The 50-120 runs I did in 3rd gear, so the engine was reving at about 5000-6000 RPM at the start. Lag? Not really. About 1/8th to a 1/4 second lag on shifts. Hopefully I can get a video up soon to show everyone what its like.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #72  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by ya@inlinepro,Feb 19 2007, 12:41 PM
for the most part, yes this is the biggest turbo you can get in there. Its not PUNY but compared to the other turob's we have used... its small.

this turbo on higher boost level with a good exhaust system can still make 500+ rwhp.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 03:15 AM
  #73  
EriS2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,109
Likes: 2
Default

400 WHP @ 19.5 PSI?????????

There something WRONG

My Friend at your Same Boost PSI's Made 520WHP

me @ 12psi 380WHP Comptech SC
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 03:27 AM
  #74  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by Eri_S2k,Feb 20 2007, 07:15 AM
400 WHP @ 19.5 PSI?????????

There something WRONG

My Friend at your Same Boost PSI's Made 520WHP

me @ 12psi 380WHP Comptech SC
Methinks you can't read.

I have a 2.25" exhaust on my car, 9:1 compression, and a very small turbo for quick spool.

What turbo is your friend running? What exhaust? What manifold? How aggressive is his tune? Look at my power curve and let me know when you think my exhaust says "no, thanks, I think I've had enough air..."

The high boost to get this number is a result of a LOT of factors. Kleecker also needed high boost (18psi) on his GT35R to achieve 400+ rwhp. He is also using this HKS Hi-Power exhaust.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 03:30 AM
  #75  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Just doubled-checked with Inline on the turbo selection. Officially it is a:

GT3076RB

- Garrett GT3076 core
- Precision Turbo B cover compressor housing. (For fitment). 0.70 A/R
- Precision Turbo T3 turbine housing which says 0.63 on the housing but it is in fact a 0.48 A/R
- Very limited by my exhaust. I call it traction control.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 05:53 AM
  #76  
geists2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C45P312,Feb 19 2007, 07:26 PM
I mean, is it actualy cutting the frame?! Does anyone have pictures?


Some have just blown a hole in the frame, but mine is more of a notch.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 06:01 AM
  #77  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Feb 20 2007, 07:30 AM
Just doubled-checked with Inline on the turbo selection. Officially it is a:

GT3076RB

- Garrett GT3076 core
- Precision Turbo B cover compressor housing. (For fitment). 0.70 A/R
- Precision Turbo T3 turbine housing which says 0.63 on the housing but it is in fact a 0.48 A/R
- Very limited by my exhaust. I call it traction control.
That's why it poops out at the top end and you have to put so much boost to it to try and get a decent amount of power at 9000 rpm. Any turbine A/R smaller than .8 is just too small and the turbo always poops out on the top end or isn't efficient up there. That size of turbine housing just can't work efficiently at 9000 rpm and is why at 5000 rpm it is efficient.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #78  
geists2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Eri_S2k,Feb 20 2007, 07:15 AM
400 WHP @ 19.5 PSI?????????

There something WRONG

My Friend at your Same Boost PSI's Made 520WHP

me @ 12psi 380WHP Comptech SC
I was curious about this.

I'm making the same power with the same kit and a slightly larger turbo @ 14psi.

I doubt a 2.5 inch exhaust would have the great an impact. I think the turbo is too small.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:34 AM
  #79  
AP1_S2k's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,341
Likes: 0
From: Southern MD
Default

Originally Posted by geists2k,Feb 20 2007, 01:00 PM
I was curious about this.

I'm making the same power with the same kit and a slightly larger turbo @ 14psi.

I doubt a 2.5 inch exhaust would have the great an impact. I think the turbo is too small.
What turbo are you running??? Just out of curiosity
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #80  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by AP1_S2k,Feb 20 2007, 01:34 PM
What turbo are you running??? Just out of curiosity
I pretty sure it's a custom 35R .50 A/R comp. with a smaller turbine A/R than the typical .7 to .8.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 AM.