New tune numbers
Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 16 2009, 05:02 PM
And why inferior? If you look at the professional scene, the Evo is dominating the S2000 in every category...drag racing, road racing and autocrossing. It is simply better. Own it.
......and the s2k is something differant. there's a lot of 4 door sedans. it's a whole differant class. it's truly comparing apples to oranges. if you'd like to compare apples to apples, STI's PWN EVO's! look better, more durable, faster.
really, i think the Evo is a respectable sportscar, but not the best in it's class, and certainly not unique.
sorry for the others like me that really just want to hear about what this thread is supposed to be about. i dont want to hijack it and turn it into an arguement, but just figured i'd set the record straight

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 16 2009, 05:14 PM
Wrong. More often than not I relate to what my S2000 did...and every once in a while the Evo is discussed. Why not? Are you not a car enthusiast? Everybody wets their pants when Sideways makes false claims about being faster than a ZR1, and the minute somebody calls him out he goes into hiding and you all try to cover for him. Keep it real or go the freak home.
I am a car enthusiast, but on a S2000 Forum. Its all about the s2000's
And the last time your s2k ran great was when it was tuned by Autowave, after that you couldn't get it to rev past 7400rpms because church sucks at tuning boosted s2k's.
Enough.. all you need to do is stop effing arguing with soo many people on this forum.
Originally Posted by jake2ks2k,Sep 16 2009, 06:17 PM
uhm, still ugly as piss and chicks dig the convertable
......
and the s2k is something differant. there's a lot of 4 door sedans. it's a whole differant class. it's truly comparing apples to oranges. if you'd like to compare apples to apples, STI's PWN EVO's! look better, more durable, faster.
really, i think the Evo is a respectable sportscar, but not the best in it's class, and certainly not unique.
sorry for the others like me that really just want to hear about what this thread is supposed to be about. i dont want to hijack it and turn it into an arguement, but just figured i'd set the record straight
......and the s2k is something differant. there's a lot of 4 door sedans. it's a whole differant class. it's truly comparing apples to oranges. if you'd like to compare apples to apples, STI's PWN EVO's! look better, more durable, faster.
really, i think the Evo is a respectable sportscar, but not the best in it's class, and certainly not unique.
sorry for the others like me that really just want to hear about what this thread is supposed to be about. i dont want to hijack it and turn it into an arguement, but just figured i'd set the record straight

Sure chicks dig convertibles. Check.
Apples to oranges. Check.
STI's PWNT Evos. Definitely not. The Evo has always dominated the STI in professional competition. Period.
Evo not best in its class? Are you sure? I am pretty sure it has dominated every car in its class.
If a world-wide poll was taken to determine which car was better...S2000 or Evo...I can guarantee you the Evo would win hands down.
From a production perspective, the only two cars with better overall ratings are the C6 Z06 and GT-R. Other than that the Evo has been proclaimed the pound for pound best bang for the buck.
as to the op. If you can make it to 800hp on your s2k then that would be badass!! i remember mase tuning someones stock block and made 616whp on dynamics, while the car having more then 125k miles on it. i think you can hit that # with a good tuner
[QUOTE=2QYK4U,Sep 16 2009, 05:24 PM]
If a world-wide poll was taken to determine which car was better...S2000 or Evo...I can guarantee you the Evo would win hands down.
From a production perspective, the only two cars with better overall ratings are the C6 Z06 and GT-R.
If a world-wide poll was taken to determine which car was better...S2000 or Evo...I can guarantee you the Evo would win hands down.
From a production perspective, the only two cars with better overall ratings are the C6 Z06 and GT-R.
Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 16 2009, 05:24 PM
Ok...you are one of the dumbest people I have seen post on here.
Sure chicks dig convertibles. Check.
Apples to oranges. Check.
STI's PWNT Evos. Definitely not. The Evo has always dominated the STI in professional competition. Period.
Evo not best in its class? Are you sure? I am pretty sure it has dominated every car in its class.
If a world-wide poll was taken to determine which car was better...S2000 or Evo...I can guarantee you the Evo would win hands down.
From a production perspective, the only two cars with better overall ratings are the C6 Z06 and GT-R. Other than that the Evo has been proclaimed the pound for pound best bang for the buck.
Sure chicks dig convertibles. Check.
Apples to oranges. Check.
STI's PWNT Evos. Definitely not. The Evo has always dominated the STI in professional competition. Period.
Evo not best in its class? Are you sure? I am pretty sure it has dominated every car in its class.
If a world-wide poll was taken to determine which car was better...S2000 or Evo...I can guarantee you the Evo would win hands down.
From a production perspective, the only two cars with better overall ratings are the C6 Z06 and GT-R. Other than that the Evo has been proclaimed the pound for pound best bang for the buck.
Originally Posted by jake2ks2k,Sep 16 2009, 06:34 PM
sti is faster 0-60 and 1/4 mile stock, WAY tougher drivetrain, and still looks cooler 

Some people really need to get a life... I'm getting close to lock this thread. 2QY get over yourself. I have so much I want to say to you right now, but I do not want to screw this thread up anymore then it already is...


