She's Alive!
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Goshen, KY
Only two words can describe this car now. ****** SICK. Went from mildly nutty to absolutly FuXzIn BoNkeRs!! Looks amazing man can't wait to see some videos. PS you better take more this year, I watched your 9sec. countless times. 
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: VA
Might be a dumb question but why would you spend all the extra cash on the different rear and trans setup when you had a setup capable of holding huge power before? We know that inline has pushed there setup to 933whp.Is there any big advantages to the new rear and trans setup?
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Originally Posted by *JG*,Jun 1 2010, 07:14 PM
Might be a dumb question but why would you spend all the extra cash on the different rear and trans setup when you had a setup capable of holding huge power before? We know that inline has pushed there setup to 933whp.Is there any big advantages to the new rear and trans setup?
this is definitely going to be a nasty car...as if it wasnt before
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 14
From: Zionsville, IN
Originally Posted by *JG*,Jun 1 2010, 11:14 PM
Might be a dumb question but why would you spend all the extra cash on the different rear and trans setup when you had a setup capable of holding huge power before? We know that inline has pushed there setup to 933whp.Is there any big advantages to the new rear and trans setup?
Plus, I don't believe IP launches the car at 933whp. I can now.
Well, I have to make that kind of power first. And IP is building my motor, so I'm sure I can. lolHonestly, do you not know the advantage of drag style 4-link setup with a 9" compared to a stock IRS with a Nissan differential???
