S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Sideways latest setup

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 11:02 PM
  #41  
DragonHeart's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 28,167
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach,CA
Default

Nicely done, Phil...
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 11:21 PM
  #42  
SRap1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Default

can you post the dyno graphs, before and after: i would like to see how the header and cam gears effected low end rpms
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:38 AM
  #43  
Sideways's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

The before and after start out about the same at 3000 rpm and then the spread just gradually increases up to 8800 rpm. No gain or loss in the first 3000 rpm.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 07:39 AM
  #44  
fishs2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 2
Default

That much WHP from a S/C must be insane.......I would LOVE to see some videos of this............VIDEOS!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 07:44 AM
  #45  
Sideways's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

[QUOTE=fishs2000,Sep 16 2010, 08:39 AM]That much WHP from a S/C must be insane.......I would LOVE to see some videos of this............VIDEOS!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #46  
Sideways's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

I fixed the belt problem duh.....nothing a couple more turns on the adjuster wouldn't take care of.

I am having some start up and idle issues so back to the dyno today for some more of that Shawn Church magic tuning and maybe a full power pull.



My new look, I polished the Volks.
Double click on the picture for enlargement:

Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 05:56 AM
  #47  
stitos2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: NJ shore
Default

The only problem I have is you are on the "magical" Church Dyno... the one that reads 30-40whp more than everyone else. Anytime I see a whp from someone who went to church I always assume it's much less than shown.

Sorry, someone had to say it.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 06:09 AM
  #48  
Sideways's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by stitos2k,Sep 21 2010, 06:56 AM
The only problem I have is you are on the "magical" Church Dyno... the one that reads 30-40whp more than everyone else. Anytime I see a whp from someone who went to church I always assume it's much less than shown.

Sorry, someone had to say it.
Well, you are not the first one in this thread. It is hard to believe so many posters from elsewhere jump on that band wagon and have never used Church Automotive Testing. It just shows internet bias.

It does not matter how high the dyno reads, I am using it as a tool to measure improvements.

You can whittle down that 33 rwhp and 22 ft lbs torque to what ever numbers you want but it is still enough for the butt dyno to feel with a big passenger.

For all of you that are dyno challenged, I'll put it on another dyno one of these days.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 06:39 AM
  #49  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

reagardless of the dyno reading high, look at the delta, stock ap1s dyno around 205-215ish on this dyno, and he is at 500+. he is still over 300whp more then a stock ap1. thats crazy and on a blower at that!

if you dyno on another dyno, it will just give another way to compare the numbers to others that may want to duplicate what you are doing.

more then anything, church dyno being higher then others just makes it hard for others to follow in your footsteps when they may fall 5-10% short. of a 500whp goal.

anywho, still serious power.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 08:02 AM
  #50  
stitos2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: NJ shore
Default

[QUOTE=Sideways,Sep 21 2010, 09:09 AM] Well, you are not the first one in this thread. It is hard to believe so many posters from elsewhere jump on that band wagon and have never used Church Automotive Testing. It just shows internet bias.

It does not matter how high the dyno reads, I am using it as a tool to measure improvements.

You can whittle down that 33 rwhp and 22 ft lbs torque to what ever numbers you want but it is still enough for the butt dyno to feel with a big passenger.

For all of you that are dyno challenged, I'll put it on another dyno one of these days.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 AM.