S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Steed Speed manifold: the saga

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 07:20 AM
  #31  
t.vo408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah, I wish there were some other pics of it.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 06:09 AM
  #32  
Scorpion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: Riverview
Default

Not impressed by how it looks as the runners taper down before the turbo flange.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 06:58 AM
  #33  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by Scorpion,Jul 6 2007, 10:09 AM
Not impressed by how it looks as the runners taper down before the turbo flange.
Thats actually a good thing. At the expense of a bit more restriction (backpressure felt by the engine) the tapering of the runners increases the gas velocity and will help to spin the turbine to a higher rotational velocity sooner. The result is lower spool times. It's hard to say for sure, but the decreased spool time may outweight the slight increase in boost pressure needed to achieve a specific HP target.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 05:05 AM
  #34  
Scorpion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: Riverview
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Jul 6 2007, 09:58 AM
Thats actually a good thing. At the expense of a bit more restriction (backpressure felt by the engine) the tapering of the runners increases the gas velocity and will help to spin the turbine to a higher rotational velocity sooner. The result is lower spool times. It's hard to say for sure, but the decreased spool time may outweight the slight increase in boost pressure needed to achieve a specific HP target.
Agree, but without knowing the actual runner dimensions it's hard to say how much effect it will have on gas flow. I personnaly would rather have open runners so I'm not limited on how much I can flow later down the line say I want more power.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 04:46 AM
  #35  
HiVolume's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default

Originally Posted by t.vo408,Jul 5 2007, 07:20 AM
Yeah, I wish there were some other pics of it.
Here a few older pics of it installed. I've since upgraded to a 44mm wastegate and had it ceramic coated.



Reply
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 05:36 AM
  #36  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Love the PWR intercooler.

Can you pm me some pictures of the inner core if you have them. I have heard that this is a tube in shell configuration.
Don
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #37  
HiVolume's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo,Jun 28 2007, 05:16 PM
Interesting that the manifold has CNC marks on the top which clearly indicates the picture is of a one-off or early prototype. No way you can mass produce that thing in volume for ~$600 with all that machining.

Jimbo
The photo is of a production piece before it was ceramic coated to properly show it was CNC machined. Once ceramic coated, you lose these details. They are being produced in Canada for 675$US without ceramic coating (85$US extra).
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #38  
HiVolume's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default

[QUOTE=MugenRioS2k,Jul 11 2007, 05:36 AM] Love the PWR intercooler.

Can you pm me some pictures of the inner core if you have them. I have heard that this is a tube in shell configuration.
Don
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #39  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

bar and plate design

was hoping for a tube in shell configuration
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #40  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

I like the setup with the PWR unit. I am looking into the exact same thing. It requires no ambient air and I wonder if in the end it will prove worthwhile. I also wonder if it really does improve turbo spool since less piping is required?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 PM.