Supercharged 60-130 Time
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
I agree lag sucks but two funny points.
1. Even with the lag an all motor modded 470whp 6.2l couldn't pull me
2. If I had brake boosted it woulda been lights out.
Centrifugal woulda hit full boost. But for that Rpm. I had 14 psi at 5k rpm ish. Next run on tape I'm brake boosting the shit outa the car.
Community Organizer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Originally Posted by DFWs2k' timestamp='1325886158' post='21293035
i couldn't really hear any beeps, lol
but OMG TURBO LAG SUCKS, YOU HAVE TO WAIT ALMOST A SECOND!! YOUR CAR IS COMPLETELY UNDRIVEABLE!SC FTW
but OMG TURBO LAG SUCKS, YOU HAVE TO WAIT ALMOST A SECOND!! YOUR CAR IS COMPLETELY UNDRIVEABLE!SC FTW
I agree lag sucks but two funny points.
1. Even with the lag an all motor modded 470whp 6.2l couldn't pull me
2. If I had brake boosted it woulda been lights out.
Centrifugal woulda hit full boost. But for that Rpm. I had 14 psi at 5k rpm ish. Next run on tape I'm brake boosting the shit outa the car.
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by camuman' timestamp='1325889042' post='21293212
[quote name='DFWs2k' timestamp='1325886158' post='21293035']
i couldn't really hear any beeps, lol
but OMG TURBO LAG SUCKS, YOU HAVE TO WAIT ALMOST A SECOND!! YOUR CAR IS COMPLETELY UNDRIVEABLE!SC FTW
i couldn't really hear any beeps, lol
but OMG TURBO LAG SUCKS, YOU HAVE TO WAIT ALMOST A SECOND!! YOUR CAR IS COMPLETELY UNDRIVEABLE!SC FTW
I agree lag sucks but two funny points.
1. Even with the lag an all motor modded 470whp 6.2l couldn't pull me
2. If I had brake boosted it woulda been lights out.
Centrifugal woulda hit full boost. But for that Rpm. I had 14 psi at 5k rpm ish. Next run on tape I'm brake boosting the shit outa the car.
[/quote]
YES
Community Organizer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Sent using free Tapatalk - Android FTW
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1325899047' post='21293609
[quote name='DFWs2k' timestamp='1325891460' post='21293315']
lol, i was just throwing that in for junky before he could
i haven't brake boosted yet, and haven't had to. i need to race faster cars
lol, i was just throwing that in for junky before he could
i haven't brake boosted yet, and haven't had to. i need to race faster cars
Sent using free Tapatalk - Android FTW
[/quote]
My degree in benchinomics makes me concur.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 672
Likes: 3
I do check out 6 speed online from time to time. Like most of us, I frequent a lot of sites
When I made 525 whp and ran 131 mph trap speeds we logged it on a gps vbox and ran 7.29 sec 60-130. So I would say with 400whp it is in the 11 sec range.
Turbo or SC?
I suspect you're about right, that a well set up s2000 in the 400 whp range would run somewhere in the 11's 60-130.
I'm just a little dissapointed that none of the faster S2000's have contributed to any of the 60-130 lists. I suspect that has a lot to do with the fact that it's a test that doesn't favor our cars. The only number I could find anywhere for an S2000 was 23.5 sec!! This was, of course, bone stock.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1325873789' post='21292256
No I havent, but its quick. My guess is 6-7 sec. Probably be quicker if I didnt have to shift to 5th.
I suspect you're about right, that a well set up s2000 in the 400 whp range would run somewhere in the 11's 60-130.
I'm just a little dissapointed that none of the faster S2000's have contributed to any of the 60-130 lists. I suspect that has a lot to do with the fact that it's a test that doesn't favor our cars. The only number I could find anywhere for an S2000 was 23.5 sec!! This was, of course, bone stock.
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1325889807' post='21293248
Op must have been on the 6 speed website huh?
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1325873789' post='21292256
No I havent, but its quick. My guess is 6-7 sec. Probably be quicker if I didnt have to shift to 5th.
I suspect you're about right, that a well set up s2000 in the 400 whp range would run somewhere in the 11's 60-130.
I'm just a little dissapointed that none of the faster S2000's have contributed to any of the 60-130 lists. I suspect that has a lot to do with the fact that it's a test that doesn't favor our cars. The only number I could find anywhere for an S2000 was 23.5 sec!! This was, of course, bone stock.
Not many in the s2k community care about straight line speed benchmarks. If u look for road course track times totally different story.
That being said there are still a few s2ks on this site that move out. Real street being one of them.