S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Turbo head build, light weight vs aggressive cams

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-07-2018, 03:03 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
F1TwoThousand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 813
Received 65 Likes on 53 Posts
Default Turbo head build, light weight vs aggressive cams

Would really appreciate some recommendations. I'd like to build a head that will rev to 9k rpm for a turbod ap2. I'm thinking titanium retainers and keepers to lighten the valvetrain ever so slightly, getting new oem ap2 springs, and some lightweight forged valves again just to lighten valvetrain. Or is it recommended to get some turbo specific cams, and stiffer springs and rev it out to 9.5k? Trying to decide between the two options would like to hear from experienced builds before i decide. Do aftermarket s2k cams affect drive ability at all, do they have their own high and low v-tehc cam profiles?
Old 07-07-2018, 10:42 AM
  #2  

 
soulicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,126
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I think you’re going to be limited to rev’n that high due to having an AP2 bottom end. At those speeds, there will be a lot of stress on the road bolts at least. You can probably due it for a short period of time. I had an AP1 short block in my AP2 while my original block was getting built. I took that up to 9k with no problems. That was with a supertech valve train. I wouldn’t dare trying that on my AP2 short block.
Old 07-07-2018, 02:33 PM
  #3  

 
riceball777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 3,116
Received 72 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

people generally dont run aftermarket cams. Everyone that has tried have always went back to the stock cams. 9,000 rpm is pleanty and most poepl also dontrev higher. If you have over 500whp you should extend the gearing with a lower final drive. I run a 3.9 final drive with a 26 inch tall tire and with a 9000rpm redline my gears are already pretty long.
Old 07-08-2018, 03:18 PM
  #4  

 
LostMarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 342
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Be like Duffy and antilag on stock head, you'lll be fine
Old 07-10-2018, 02:42 AM
  #5  

Thread Starter
 
F1TwoThousand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 813
Received 65 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Think im going to go with full ferrea valvetrain with stock cams. Am thinking of getting a bc stage 2 turbo cam but not sure
Old 07-10-2018, 02:15 PM
  #6  

 
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F1TwoThousand
Think im going to go with full ferrea valvetrain with stock cams. Am thinking of getting a bc stage 2 turbo cam but not sure
My car seems to work pretty well with the NA BC Stage 2's



AP2 crank, roughly 9,500rpm with full Ferrea valvetrain. Edit: forgot I actually have the BC springs/retainers.

Last edited by hatrickstu; 07-11-2018 at 05:23 AM.
Old 07-10-2018, 02:56 PM
  #7  

 
Mijae007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,681
Received 74 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

^^^ well there you have it
Old 07-10-2018, 08:51 PM
  #8  
Registered User

 
MARK AUS S2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 535
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

So what exactly does a BC Stage 2 CAM do that an AP1 cam doesn't?
Old 07-11-2018, 05:22 AM
  #9  

 
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MARK AUS S2K
So what exactly does a BC Stage 2 CAM do that an AP1 cam doesn't?
BrianCrower.com | RunBC.com // Honda // F20C / F22C.

Those dyno comparisons are straight from Real Street.
Old 07-11-2018, 09:13 AM
  #10  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

The F22 top and bottom end will take 9k rpms. The head is already better equipped then the F20 to handle the rpm, but the cam profile doesn't breath there quite as willingly. Ap1 cams would take care of that. As for the bottom end, eventually the piston side loading will ovalize the cylinders and you will start to lose compression/wear over the mid term. Then again even the F20 have that issue, it just takes longer because the rod angle isn't as severe as the F22. I put about 80k miles on a supercharged F22 with an Ap1 ecu and it saw 9k often.


Quick Reply: Turbo head build, light weight vs aggressive cams



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM.