Vortech Stock s2000 Breaks 12's
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by smirfs2k05,Dec 17 2008, 02:56 PM
Actually no comparison was being made. Randy's car made 365 at church than he dyno'd at skunk2 and made 326. Just comparing different dynos. Also I don't know if you knew this but church's dyno is a dynapack which reads the the hubs, vs the superflow at skunk2 which is a roller dyno.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: FilthIEst
what does all this have to do with breaking 12's with a stock s2000? hahaah j/k yes Paul is right, they are 2 different dynos (dynapack and superflow) they will read differently and I think Randy was just posting numbers up for info and that Vortech's kit are very consistant compared to V2 vs V3 and AP1, APV vs DBW........
Hey Sideways I heard you can help my life with a bolt that is needed with the Vortech SC? Can I pick one up from you or let me know where to get them?
Hey Sideways I heard you can help my life with a bolt that is needed with the Vortech SC? Can I pick one up from you or let me know where to get them?
Community Organizer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
If we are going to compare dyno's for sake of learning something about a mod or performance etc. I have learned and agree it is important to distinguish dynos. The best bet and most consistent widely used dyno meter with median results seems to be the Dynojet, so when I see numbers that I want to make comparisons on, this is the number scope that I am expecting to base on. The dynopack is accurate in how it measures compared to other dynopack's, but its an uncommon dynometer, certainly on this sight and not everyone knows that, best to base on a roller type. Its safe to say that this form of measure is closer to flywheel hp then not, which gets down to my original statement which started this whole debate. I give sound advice on my experience to date, I dont like being mislead and I certainly don't like misleading people on this sight. that's all i have to say about it. 
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 0
From: COMPTON
[QUOTE=s2000Junky,Dec 17 2008, 09:34 PM] If we are going to compare dyno's for sake of learning something about a mod or performance etc. I have learned and agree it is important to distinguish dynos. The best bet and most consistent widely used dyno meter with median results seems to be the Dynojet, so when I see numbers that I want to make comparisons on, this is the number scope that I am expecting to base on. The dynopack is accurate in how it measures compared to other dynopack's, but its an uncommon dynometer, certainly on this sight and not everyone knows that, best to base on a roller type. Its safe to say that this form of measure is closer to flywheel hp then not, which gets down to my original statement which started this whole debate. I give sound advice on my experience to date, I dont like being mislead and I certainly don't like misleading people on this sight. that's all i have to say about it.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,255
Likes: 0
From: Victorville
man all Randy did was post his dyno results from one dyno and from another. Now if we were like oh his car made more power than such and such car okay. But for the sake of this argument, but more so to end this argument we're just comparing the numbers from one dyno to another on the same car/same mods etc.
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Dec 17 2008, 10:01 PM
Your missing the point, on 100% of the roller dynos out there which we all measure by, that would be to the crank, get it now? This isn't Honda Tech
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 0
From: COMPTON
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Dec 17 2008, 10:38 PM
No It didn't come across that way at all. It was about how much a stock Vortech makes to the wheel of a stock s2000 which was very misleading, just wanted to get clarification. 290-315whp is the expected normal whp on this kit.
