S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

What type of manifold?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 1, 2012 | 09:35 PM
  #61  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

My ABS box required shifting to the side a bit. The clutch mastercylinder is over my downpipe but I have heaps of insulation around it and I haven't had a problem.
Reply
Old May 1, 2012 | 09:54 PM
  #62  
Bigfootexpert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Ft. Bragg, NC
Default

You would think that the Throttle body be your first restriction instead of the manifold.
Reply
Old May 1, 2012 | 10:20 PM
  #63  
manny-s2000's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AusS2000
My ABS box required shifting to the side a bit. The clutch mastercylinder is over my downpipe but I have heaps of insulation around it and I haven't had a problem.
Oh ok that's good to know. I may also get a friend of mine to make me a heatshield when I find out which kit I'm going with.
Reply
Old May 1, 2012 | 10:36 PM
  #64  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

Originally Posted by Bigfootexpert
You would think that the Throttle body be your first restriction instead of the manifold.
You might think that if you had no idea what you were talking about.
Reply
Old May 1, 2012 | 11:42 PM
  #65  
Bigfootexpert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Ft. Bragg, NC
Default

You might think that if you had no idea what you were talking about.

Reply
Old May 2, 2012 | 12:13 AM
  #66  
Corey Maurer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,401
Likes: 1
From: Gansevoort, NY
Default

Maybe read the thread first..
Reply
Old May 2, 2012 | 05:31 AM
  #67  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by AusS2000
Originally Posted by Bigfootexpert' timestamp='1335938074' post='21661556
You would think that the Throttle body be your first restriction instead of the manifold.
You might think that if you had no idea what you were talking about.
There is a significant difference between sucking thru a TB and blowing thru it.
Reply
Old May 2, 2012 | 06:19 AM
  #68  
Kings Performance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Default

Let me know fi we can help you in any way


Fernando @ Kings Performance
Reply
Old May 2, 2012 | 07:39 AM
  #69  
05TurboS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24,119
Likes: 4
From: Seattle / Kalifornia
Default

Originally Posted by camuman
Originally Posted by AusS2000' timestamp='1335940575' post='21661612
[quote name='Bigfootexpert' timestamp='1335938074' post='21661556']
You would think that the Throttle body be your first restriction instead of the manifold.
You might think that if you had no idea what you were talking about.
There is a significant difference between sucking thru a TB and blowing thru it.
[/quote]


This IS true it's why I say don't bother with intake manifold mods/changes etc. HOWEVER, there's still some gains to be had and in Bigfoot's defense, it actually probably is a restricted part, I'm figuring this by the piping size of it with the obstruction of the butterfly valve in the middle. Though I think the gains would be marginal at best I would expect SOME gains but only in hp numbers around 500whp+.

As you all know flow through piping exponentially looses efficiency with speed. Somewhere around mach .4 the air turbulence begins to degrade at a highly exponential rate. With that said somewhere in the ball park of around 700CFM things are going to start past that point. That's roughly...oh idk 500whp or so when figuring a 52/lb turbo or so. Thus where I get my estimate. So perhaps consider it if you're well beyond that range.

I can provide the exact formulas for these calculations if you guys request but I'm doing em rough in my head for the moment.
Reply
Old May 2, 2012 | 03:06 PM
  #70  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

I was being a bit of a smartass (nothing new here) with my reply to Bigfoot's post but have since wondered if maybe I don't get the joke.

I thought this thread was about hot side manifolds, log vs. tubular, and whether there is ever an argument for the log design, even if it's just as a low cost entry level (Stage1) component.

In my time playing with S2000 FI I have not seen any advantage in mucking about with the cold side. I currently run the stock intake manifold and a slightly enlarged throttle body, but not because it is advantageous, just because after installing it and finding no advantage, there seemed no pint in changing it back.

At the end of the day my argument boils down to this: It doesn't matter how large your throttle body is if you are running a shitty log manifold.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 PM.