The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Modified / Vented Rear Bumpers

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #21  
unidextrous's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Covina
Default

[QUOTE=EternalLx,Nov 15 2007, 07:43 PM] AP2 bumper does look better than AP1. But the ASM bumper with vents looks hot, just search for Deiz's car.

and atleast we not doing those vents with the multi-holes like the civics
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #22  
EternalLx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 1
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

^ IMO civics usually has the circular holes as the one in your pic..
that looks so tacky/ricey especially when its coupled with that metal plate thing, if you know what am talking about.

ASM is better designed imo.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #23  
unidextrous's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Covina
Default

Style seems to be more of a concern to you, rather than function.

Companies like ASM dont put holes on a bumper because they think it looks cool. It serves a function, and fashion of the function is accepted.

..and again with this tacky and ricey thing. that car has a parachute, kill switch, skinnies, huge slicks, a striaght 4 inch exhaust..and its TACKY? who's really the ricer here?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #24  
EternalLx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 1
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

It is functional let it be a S or a Civic but when its on a Civic with an stock engine and some bolt-ons; I can only assume that they did that for style and I for one cant see style in that.

That is why I say rice but am not bashing on the civic in the pic... that is fine to me seeing how its a drag monster. I wonder what it runs?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #25  
Chris_Lum's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 103
From: Irvine
Default

[QUOTE=Emil St-Hilaire,Nov 15 2007, 07:46 PM]
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #26  
unidextrous's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Covina
Default

[QUOTE=EternalLx,Nov 15 2007, 09:57 PM] It is functional let it be a S or a Civic but when its on a Civic with an stock engine and some bolt-ons; I can only assume that they did that for style and I for one cant see style in that.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #27  
SK's Avatar
SK
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: BC, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Chris_Lum,Nov 15 2007, 10:07 PM
What bumper is this?
That should be a Garage Defend rear bumper.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 11:15 PM
  #28  
jonner's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 17,393
Likes: 19
From: Kiltokyo
Default

Some tastly modified bumpers there...
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 11:36 PM
  #29  
innovation's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by unidextrous,Nov 15 2007, 10:13 PM
Funny how you say stock civic w/ bolt-ons when 95% of all s2000 owners with aero mods only have bolt-ons. Im not bashing on that either because some of the fastest guys on the track only have bolt-ons, be it a s2000 or civic. Yes..i said civic. My friends coworker proved that with his stock b16 EF @ buttonwillow. 2:07, which is faster than some of the Limited FR class cars at the time attack.
that car weighs like nothing
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:41 AM
  #30  
Dressed2Kill's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte NC
Default

with mesh

without mesh
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:44 AM.