What Do You Think???
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 0
From: Dana Point, CA
I guess I'll be the one to buck the tide....
A little ricey, if you ask me.
I've never understood the point in adding all that weight in the form of body kits. You're nevery going to get that Subbie up to a speed that they'd make a difference (assuming they even do).
Further, that puppy is so low, it'll bottom out on damn near every speedbump in S.CA. I'd hate to think what would happen anywhere where it snows.
Don't get me wrong, I like the WRX. I think it's a hell of a performance package for the $. But I think, you're far better off spending the coin on drivetrain components than you are sinking money into heavy, basically useless body trim pieces.
No flames intended, but you asked for opinions.
PS - as to the statement that the car is now "worthy enough to stand up to the S2K". I have to cry foul again. Two completely different cars. Just because two cars are relatively comparable from the standpoint of 0-60 acceleration does not make the cars similar in mission, scope or otherwise. I've stated a million times on this board that I am constantly surprised at how people "cross shop" cars as diverse in mission as the S2K, Lexus IS300 and Subbie WRX. Three completely different types of cars, IMO.
A little ricey, if you ask me.
I've never understood the point in adding all that weight in the form of body kits. You're nevery going to get that Subbie up to a speed that they'd make a difference (assuming they even do).
Further, that puppy is so low, it'll bottom out on damn near every speedbump in S.CA. I'd hate to think what would happen anywhere where it snows.
Don't get me wrong, I like the WRX. I think it's a hell of a performance package for the $. But I think, you're far better off spending the coin on drivetrain components than you are sinking money into heavy, basically useless body trim pieces.
No flames intended, but you asked for opinions.
PS - as to the statement that the car is now "worthy enough to stand up to the S2K". I have to cry foul again. Two completely different cars. Just because two cars are relatively comparable from the standpoint of 0-60 acceleration does not make the cars similar in mission, scope or otherwise. I've stated a million times on this board that I am constantly surprised at how people "cross shop" cars as diverse in mission as the S2K, Lexus IS300 and Subbie WRX. Three completely different types of cars, IMO.
