S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Hell yeah...

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 05:55 AM
  #51  
Bliss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by GravyRobber

Not true at all. The S2000 is VERY rigid, and won't "twist apart".

With that said, I'm not a huge fan. I certainly appreciate what it is, and the work/engineering that went into it. Very impressive for sure. I just feel like it goes against the intent of the S2000. I'd rather just own and S2000 and a Corvette. Probably less money. And with all that said, I'd rather see an s2000 like this ANY DAY over a "hellaflush" monstrosity.

In a nut shell, I love it, but it's not really my thing.
Hmm three times more torque we suspect there will be weak links.
Most suspect differential replace that weak link then whats next to give? I hope yer right be nice to know the s2000 drive line and structure can handle that added torque.

Sounds like he wants a car he can abuse so I'm sure we will hear the reports later.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 06:29 AM
  #52  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

Originally Posted by Bliss
Originally Posted by GravyRobber

Not true at all. The S2000 is VERY rigid, and won't "twist apart".

With that said, I'm not a huge fan. I certainly appreciate what it is, and the work/engineering that went into it. Very impressive for sure. I just feel like it goes against the intent of the S2000. I'd rather just own and S2000 and a Corvette. Probably less money. And with all that said, I'd rather see an s2000 like this ANY DAY over a "hellaflush" monstrosity.

In a nut shell, I love it, but it's not really my thing.
Hmm three times more torque we suspect there will be weak links.
Most suspect differential replace that weak link then whats next to give? I hope yer right be nice to know the s2000 drive line and structure can handle that added torque.

Sounds like he wants a car he can abuse so I'm sure we will hear the reports later.
The s2000 chasis is very rigid. The tranny, diff, and axles are weak (but are very capable of holding double to even triple the horsepower that it was designed to, just don't go around dumping the clutch )
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 06:58 AM
  #53  
Bliss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by baZurk

The s2000 chasis is very rigid. The tranny, diff, and axles are weak (but are very capable of holding double to even triple the horsepower that it was designed to, just don't go around dumping the clutch )
We are talking torque not hp apples and oranges.

I will take your word for it your right depends how you drive. He said he wanted to do drive hard.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 07:09 AM
  #54  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

Originally Posted by Bliss
Originally Posted by baZurk

The s2000 chasis is very rigid. The tranny, diff, and axles are weak (but are very capable of holding double to even triple the horsepower that it was designed to, just don't go around dumping the clutch )
We are talking torque not hp apples and oranges.

I will take your word for it your right depends how you drive. He said he wanted to do drive hard.
I just wanted to point out that what you were talking about was different then who you quoted earlier.

He was referring to the chasis and you were reffering to drivetrain components.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 07:15 AM
  #55  
Bliss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by baZurk

I just wanted to point out that what you were talking about was different then who you quoted earlier.

He was referring to the chasis and you were reffering to drivetrain components.
Oh yea no problem I actualy think both will be an issue but I'm new to the s2000 and not an expert by any means.

Hope to hear final results after some track time.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 12:38 PM
  #56  
ruut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: ga
Default

I can tell you now that I intend to BEAT THE SHIT out of my swap car. I'm doing a Camaro diff and lots of chassis bracing. I will be glad to share the pros and cons of my build as I do testing.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 01:30 PM
  #57  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

Originally Posted by ruut
I can tell you now that I intend to BEAT THE SHIT out of my swap car. I'm doing a Camaro diff and lots of chassis bracing. I will be glad to share the pros and cons of my build as I do testing.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 06:48 AM
  #58  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,655
Likes: 171
Default

Originally Posted by Bliss
Yea it is quite amazing but 50 pounds is 50 pounds and for the hp gains there are better ways imo. I suspect the 50 pounds will be bumped up later to support the torque.
It's sad you think this is an educated opinion. For the gains, show me a lighter setup?

Originally Posted by Bliss
The torque is gonna twist everything apart just wait.

gonna have to buff everything up.

Its a cool car for the wow factor but if I wanted a vett I would go buy one.


peace have fun with that.
So when you produce a 500hp tubro'd version of the F22C does the car twist apart? Where do you make this crap up from?

The weakest point is going to be the diff, which the builder is already expecting to replace but is running OE to see how long it lasts. The tranny will hold that kind of power.

I really wish people would think through their comments.

Originally Posted by mister x
I wanna hear stories about how you freaked out unsuspecting domestic muscle guys.
I think this makes the entire project worth while!

Originally Posted by ruut
I can tell you now that I intend to BEAT THE SHIT out of my swap car. I'm doing a Camaro diff and lots of chassis bracing. I will be glad to share the pros and cons of my build as I do testing.
Would love to see it. A lot of guys swear by the X brace!
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 08:41 AM
  #59  
Bliss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by rob-2
It's sad you think this is an educated opinion. For the gains, show me a lighter setup?

So when you produce a 500hp tubro'd version of the F22C does the car twist apart? Where do you make this crap up from?

The weakest point is going to be the diff, which the builder is already expecting to replace but is running OE to see how long it lasts. The tranny will hold that kind of power.

I really wish people would think through their comments.

I think this makes the entire project worth while!

Would love to see it. A lot of guys swear by the X brace!
the problem here is folks keep confusing hp is the same as torque.

The car is not done yet after all parts replaced and bracing is done weigh it.

Seem to me lots of time and money spent on this project for the gains.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 08:42 AM
  #60  
Bliss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Bliss

the problem here is folks keep confusing hp is the same as torque.

The car is not done yet after all parts replaced and bracing isdone weigh it.

Seem to me lots of time and money spent on this project for the gains.
yea lets get an educated guy in here to tell us what he thinks.

torque is not the same as hp.
get that through yer head.

so what will be weakest link once diff is replaced??

It may be good to go from there who knows I guess we will see.

No one knows what will come of this added torque. Just suspect.

Drive it hard waiting for your findings.

come on someone say is ignorance in Bliss.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM.