S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

PRM intake Good or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 06:13 AM
  #11  
s2k aok's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,616
Likes: 2
From: Lompoc CA
Default

a link to a link and i found my prm thread:

https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/743...ke-customized/

still can't figure out this "fitment" issue that everybody talks about, the prm mounts to the throttle body with a clamp and that's the only mount point, figuring how to reroute lines takes about five minutes and a couple of dollars for tubing from carquest.
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 06:22 AM
  #12  
JDMpearlwhyteZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 14
From: New Orleans
Default

Originally Posted by xoz
love my PRM..

Dyno info is PRM vs AEM.

Is that vs the AEM v1 or v2??
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 06:25 AM
  #13  
bronxbomber252's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 38
Default

The fitment issue I am talking about is the fact that since it is not attached to anything it swings around in the engine bay, it used to bounce off everything when I autox'ed with it and ding stuff up. The filter is NOT a K&N, my filter came apart and when I looked through the catalog on the K&N site there is not a single filter with the PRM filter dimensions. I had significantly more bog with it compared to the FIPK too... I loved the PRM when I first got it, and still think it sounds the best but after my experience I will never buy anything from that company again.

PS there is a reason most of the track and autox junkies you see that have intakes, have the FIPK or AEM...
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 06:36 AM
  #14  
s2k aok's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,616
Likes: 2
From: Lompoc CA
Default

had to check out the k&n filter thing, went over to the prm site, misread it, it said use the k&n filter cleaner, so no idea what filter is in there i guess, i still like the concept though with routing the tubing to the passenger side fake brake duct (i'll get around to that eventually)...
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 07:30 AM
  #15  
Importedpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default

For simplicity sake, use a good name. Cant go wrong with fipk or aem.
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 07:30 AM
  #16  
suzuka-blue-s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,783
Likes: 3
From: Liberal Kansas
Default

Yeah the intake fits fine and it doesnt have actual fitment issues, it just lacks a mounting point which can easily be done youself if you want. I've seen people make custom brackets, or have a peice of wire wrapped around the end of it and hooked to the bracket the OEM airbox was mounted to on, to cutting an FIPK box and mounting it in there. I've never had issues with my PRM sliding around even without the duct, with the duct on it's verys strudy and definetly won't slide anywhere, so it's nothing to worry about to me.

Also you are right, it is not a K&N filter, it's a K&N type filter that you just use the K&N cleaning kit on. I have cleaned mine with the kit and it's pretty much identical to any K&N filter i've seen, it's just an odd shape since it's super long.
Old Jul 25, 2011 | 12:01 AM
  #17  
mister x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 6
From: Honolulu
Default

Never had a problem with my PRM moving around. The included silicone couplers are tight and the filter assembly is light. Gains may be modest but for the $ I'm very happy with it.
Old Jul 25, 2011 | 07:44 AM
  #18  
takeshi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Akkmednoseflem
Hi guys I need some help deciding which intake to get for my 04 S2000 and came across PRM intakes and they are insanely cheap! Is it any good? how much HP gain? And if its not a good buy what are your recommendations? Thanks
Please read the other intake threads. This dead horse is so beaten there's not much left to beat on.
Old Jul 25, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #19  
Mike21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

95% of people that knock it have never used it. A review has no worth if it's written on hearsay and not personal experience.

I had the PRM. I liked it. Now I have the AEM V2. I also like it. The AEM V2 probably makes more power over the PRM, but nothing noticeable. The PRM was louder and had slightly better throttle response. It wasn't really my choice to change(car broken into, parts stolen). I wasn't gonna buy the same part twice so I decided to try something different.
Old Oct 17, 2012 | 07:26 PM
  #20  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Originally Posted by s2cho
prm you will lose hp. The gains are questionable with out a tune.

It sucks up hot air and at regular temps your engine bay is around 210 degrees. The prm is sucking all the hot air up.
Just stop.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yaboynick415
California - Bay Area S2000 Owners
25
Aug 23, 2012 12:16 PM
radtech
S2000 Talk
4
Feb 10, 2009 05:16 PM
cuonice
S2000 Talk
7
Feb 15, 2006 03:20 PM
SC2000S2k
Carolinas
1
Oct 7, 2005 06:37 AM
tuney
S2000 Under The Hood
0
Jan 28, 2003 12:24 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 PM.