70mm HFC for STR
Originally Posted by ViperASR,Jan 26 2011, 06:28 AM
So if I come to an event with a clear performance advantage that is not allowed by the rules, does that mean whoever protests is being a "baby and crying about it" because I did not adhere to the same rules that everyone else has to?
Originally Posted by chetly,Jan 26 2011, 12:26 PM
I guess I don't understand what performance advantage there is by having the CEL fix.
With the CEL fix, the 70mm HFC is illegal.
The current rules state you can't use anything to fool your CEL. The performance advantage is the difference between the 63.5mm(does not require a fooler) and 70mm HFC (requires a fooler).
If you start allowing people to circumvent the rules with "fixes", it opens a whole new can of worms. I'm going to take a set of V710s and stamp treadwear 140 on the side of them. Technically, the tires say treadwear 140, does that make them legal for STR? If we are allowed to "fix" things, then why not? Its an extreme example, but you and I both know someone will try something like that

(BTW, I hope that doesn't come across as rude, its meant to be a joke
)
The performance advantage here sounds quite obvious. You can use a 70mm HFC. Without the CEL fix option, you can't. Right?
Why do you need a CEL fix with the 70mm? Just a lack of the correct ports, or does it not work well enough and the car senses it as a bad cat?
Why do you need a CEL fix with the 70mm? Just a lack of the correct ports, or does it not work well enough and the car senses it as a bad cat?
Originally Posted by ViperASR,Jan 26 2011, 09:28 AM
So if I come to an event with a clear performance advantage that is not allowed by the rules, does that mean whoever protests is being a "baby and crying about it" because I did not adhere to the same rules that everyone else has to?
OP, I've got the 63.5mm HFC. Is the 1hp difference between the two cats going to be the difference between first and second, or is your driving going to? I saved a few bucks and bought the first used one I came across, which just happened to be the 63.5mm.
OP, I've got the 63.5mm HFC. Is the 1hp difference between the two cats going to be the difference between first and second, or is your driving going to? I saved a few bucks and bought the first used one I came across, which just happened to be the 63.5mm.
All I'm saying is "yes go buy the str legal one, but if you already have one and its not the str legal one then who cares." There is no performance gain to having or not having the Cel fix on a HFC.
Also for me to notice you have the "illegal" one I would have to climb under your car and check it out. Anyone that would truely do that must be very intimidated by you and you should take it as a complement.
I just called and ordered mine over the phone and asked for the "str mod". It was a extra $20-25.
I'm with you viper I understand the "if we allow this fix it opens a can of worms" But you would never see me personally protest someone that has a mod that has no performace gain at all. Such as the cel fix on the HFC. I'm not like that.
Originally Posted by chetly,Jan 26 2011, 12:26 PM
I guess I don't understand what performance advantage there is by having the CEL fix.
Originally Posted by ViperASR,Jan 26 2011, 09:42 AM
If you don't have the CEL fix, then the 70mm HFC is illegal.
With the CEL fix, the 70mm HFC is legal.
The current rules state you can't use anything to fool your CEL. The performance advantage is the difference between the 63.5mm(does not require a fooler) and 70mm HFC (requires a fooler).
With the CEL fix, the 70mm HFC is legal.
The current rules state you can't use anything to fool your CEL. The performance advantage is the difference between the 63.5mm(does not require a fooler) and 70mm HFC (requires a fooler).
you lost me on that one, so your saying that having the CEL fix is legal while everyone else is saying its illegal. I still don't see how having the CEL fix is a performance advantage.
Originally Posted by chetly,Jan 26 2011, 01:15 PM
you lost me on that one, so your saying that having the CEL fix is legal while everyone else is saying its illegal. I still don't see how having the CEL fix is a performance advantage.
Originally Posted by Blue Gumby,Jan 25 2011, 06:06 PM
I just talked to Brian from Berk about acquiring a HFC for STR. He knows about the flush mount bung thing(20 bucks surcharge), but he mentioned that a Jason Wong said only a 63.5mm was legal. He did say that core of the 70mm is considered rated for the S2000. It probably won't matter for next year anyways, still that's just an assumption. So is there any reason a 70mm HFC is illegal?
-Jason Wong




