deleting abs
Sorry for the confusion on lateral versus longitudinal, was just trying to help illustrate the difference between the street/race tire. As Krazik said the slip angles and longitudinal slip percentages of a tire are related.
This is in regards to the AP dual port proportioning valve I had mentioned earlier. I'd still like to be able to tune bias for wet weather conditions and this seems to be the best option while maintaining ABS and oem pedals. Unfortunately the knee point is not quite the same as our OE prop valve. Here is an overlay of the stock prop valve versus the AP. I've emailed Ap to see if they can tune a custom valve to more closely match the stock knee point.

Andrew
This is in regards to the AP dual port proportioning valve I had mentioned earlier. I'd still like to be able to tune bias for wet weather conditions and this seems to be the best option while maintaining ABS and oem pedals. Unfortunately the knee point is not quite the same as our OE prop valve. Here is an overlay of the stock prop valve versus the AP. I've emailed Ap to see if they can tune a custom valve to more closely match the stock knee point.

Andrew
Originally Posted by Andrew Wojteczko,Sep 25 2009, 10:27 AM
Sorry for the confusion on lateral versus longitudinal, was just trying to help illustrate the difference between the street/race tire. As Krazik said the slip angles and longitudinal slip percentages of a tire are related.
Originally Posted by jguerdat,Sep 25 2009, 03:58 AM
I don't see how locking the brakes would provide a shorter stopping distance [in snow/gravel] - sliding friction vs. static friction and all that.
Originally Posted by krazik,Sep 25 2009, 11:30 AM
It still is a slip angle really. It's just facing in the direction of travel.
Your tires achieve max grip at x% slip. Should be slipping them sideways or forwards for the most part doesn't matter.
Your tires achieve max grip at x% slip. Should be slipping them sideways or forwards for the most part doesn't matter.
Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Sep 25 2009, 11:43 AM
Dude, I have totally lost it many times on the track. I have never had the wheels fail to lock up because of the ABS in that situation. When you lock them down in a spin, they lock down. This is a false argument (at least, for our cars).
no way to get the wheel moving again.Also why abs sucks on snow and gravel in many cases. There isn't enuf friction to get the wheel moving again.
-Ry
Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Sep 25 2009, 03:43 PM
Dude, I have totally lost it many times on the track. I have never had the wheels fail to lock up because of the ABS in that situation. When you lock them down in a spin, they lock down. This is a false argument (at least, for our cars).
Originally Posted by krazik,Sep 26 2009, 12:16 AM
abs doesn't work when you're sideways
no way to get the wheel moving again.
Also why abs sucks on snow and gravel in many cases. There isn't enuf friction to get the wheel moving again.
-Ry
no way to get the wheel moving again.Also why abs sucks on snow and gravel in many cases. There isn't enuf friction to get the wheel moving again.
-Ry
If your car is completely sideways and you have no forward velocity (referenced to the car itself) than ABS is not doing anything.
What tinkfist said. I probably shouldn't have said "*totally* lose it".
Anyway, add a 3rd reason why I personally prefer not to have it: It takes a very reliable and simple hydraulic system (m.c., lines, calipers) and adds wheelspeed sensors and electromechanical valving controlled by a computer. This adds multiple dditional failure modes, including the computer not knowing what the hell is going on under track conditions and going into a totally inappropriate mode of operation. A guy totalled his Audi going off turn 5 at Mosport with my club (COMSCC) a few years back because the ABS got confused and took away 99% of his braking. There have been other ABS-induced track incidents over the years as well.
But anyway, even throwing out both the argument about not having full authority to lock the wheels in the event of loss of control, and the above argument about failure modes and poor computer judgement, the other reason I prefer not to have it is enough for *me*. Modulating the brakes for myself is a skill I prefer to keep in practice.
In *my* 2001 S2000 at least, the brake bias is totally fine (fronts lock first) without ABS. I know that some other cars do have this issue and are pretty much undriveable without the ABS (stupid and unecessary to set up the system that way, not failsafe).
Anyway, add a 3rd reason why I personally prefer not to have it: It takes a very reliable and simple hydraulic system (m.c., lines, calipers) and adds wheelspeed sensors and electromechanical valving controlled by a computer. This adds multiple dditional failure modes, including the computer not knowing what the hell is going on under track conditions and going into a totally inappropriate mode of operation. A guy totalled his Audi going off turn 5 at Mosport with my club (COMSCC) a few years back because the ABS got confused and took away 99% of his braking. There have been other ABS-induced track incidents over the years as well.
But anyway, even throwing out both the argument about not having full authority to lock the wheels in the event of loss of control, and the above argument about failure modes and poor computer judgement, the other reason I prefer not to have it is enough for *me*. Modulating the brakes for myself is a skill I prefer to keep in practice.
In *my* 2001 S2000 at least, the brake bias is totally fine (fronts lock first) without ABS. I know that some other cars do have this issue and are pretty much undriveable without the ABS (stupid and unecessary to set up the system that way, not failsafe).






