S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Dry Sump......

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 05:17 AM
  #41  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by krazik,Oct 28 2004, 10:08 PM
The engine mounts won't do you any good w/o the oil pan.
That is the opposite of what I was suggesting. If the engine mounts are a significant part of the cost, then maybe some people would not want them.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 08:22 AM
  #42  
slick rick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
From: la
Default

Originally Posted by davepk,Oct 29 2004, 02:26 AM
$1500 range??

Dude! Take a look around and price out the 3 main components, pump, pan and tank. Hell, the pump is around $700 and the pan is around $400. Add to that the tank, belt drive hw, oil filter hw, AN fittings and hose. Oh and dont forget the mounting bracket and the oem oil pump block off plate. I know i'm forgetting a few items.
Yeah, you're right. with the engine mounts and everything 2000 makes more sense.

However.

I would recomend that you and Rylan hold off on that mod for a while.


Some racing organizations don't allow dry sumps..............


dk
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 09:45 AM
  #43  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Why would a racing org not allow dry sumps? That wouldn't make any sense.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 09:56 AM
  #44  
Ludedude's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,835
Likes: 1
From: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Default

Why does the SCCA allow shock and swaybar replacement in a "stock" class? Doesn't make any sense either but racing organizations are free to do what they please.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #45  
krazik's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

yeah Karner which classes don't allow dry sumps? Besides "stock" classes of course.

They don't really offer any performance advantage themselves. Just increased reliablity.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #46  
slick rick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
From: la
Default

Hmmmm......


The classes that I'm interested in personally don't allow them.

Don't ask me.


I'm trying to keep you from doing a mod that would keep you from racing with us.

That's all.


Racing organizations are weid sometimes.


I'm working on a mod that puts baffle doors in a stock oil pan.


Would any of you be interested?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:13 AM
  #47  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

It also seems like a dry sump couild be considered a safety feature. Doesn't SCCA allow roll cages in stock classes?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:18 AM
  #48  
payneinthe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Oct 29 2004, 12:13 PM
It also seems like a dry sump couild be considered a safety feature. Doesn't SCCA allow roll cages in stock classes?
Not the best way to look at it. By extension, if I'm making steering inputs that require 1.5gs to stay on track, then slicks would be safer, as I'd be less likely to go off.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #49  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by payneinthe,Oct 29 2004, 02:18 PM
Not the best way to look at it. By extension, if I'm making steering inputs that require 1.5gs to stay on track, then slicks would be safer, as I'd be less likely to go off.
As stated before, the dry sump is not a performance benefit (unlike your example). I could understand the racing org not allowing the engine to be lowered, but it wouldn't make any sense for them to ban a reliability item. That would be like them banning synthetic oil. If anything, the dry sump will probably be a slight disadvantage from a performance standpoint (considerably more weight). The only performance advantage would be the lowered engine (which isn't necessarily required for the dry sump).

Are oil coolers banned by any racing orgs?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #50  
jzr's Avatar
jzr
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Decreasing crank windage can be a big performance advantage. Additional oil quantity and/or cooling capacity in cars where heat buildup is an issue is also an advantage.

Dry sump isn't legal in SCCA Solo2's Stock or Street Prepared classes, and I'm not sure it's even legal in Prepared. It's not legal in Honda-Challenge either, as Karner implies.

There are plenty of mods that could be considered "reliability" mods that aren't allowed (rubber hose replacement on RX7-TT for example) because it leads to a slippery slope of what is done for reliability vs. performance.

Karner, King and Spoon both have pans out for the car, and I think Erik Messley (EMI) custom-did one for Paul Mumford's S2000. Their designs might provide some good ideas in how to build yours...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.