S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Element Tuning Time Attack STI

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #71  
FINAL GEAR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

here are some really cool facts and photos of high wing mounts from back in the days.




The rear wing on those classic NASCAR special Daytonas and Superbirds were that high because the engineers realized the height of the wing did not significantly affect the downforce created, so they mounted it high enough to allow the trunk to open on the retail street versions.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #72  
trinydex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bellwilliam,Apr 15 2010, 01:20 PM
it is the lack of engineering of whoever built the mount.

the fact that THIS wing hasn't failed in 3 years, then failed within first hot lap tells me it is the new mount. by going up a foot higher don't suddenly give you 3x more down force that start breaking stuff. I've seen the same wing going around T1 at Cal Speedway at 170MPH. may be on 20 different cars going through same turn at 150MPH.
also the higher the mount the higher the torque that is generated away from the base. that means more force available to deflect the wing laterally and stress that mounting joint.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #73  
trinydex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Momentum,Apr 16 2010, 12:13 PM
I don't even know what the goal would be in getting the wing that high up, especially if they are going to leave that little wing on the back of the roof that is specifically designed to keep airflow attached to the rear windshield.
so you can pop the trunk?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 02:25 AM
  #74  
BKL's Avatar
BKL
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by trinydex,Apr 19 2010, 04:23 PM
also the higher the mount the higher the torque that is generated away from the base. that means more force available to deflect the wing laterally and stress that mounting joint.
That is not correct. The lever arm length does not change from the wing to the attachment point of the hardpoint to the top of the stand. The torque remains the same.

The torque at the bottom of the base (attached to the trunk of the car), is the one that increases.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:17 AM
  #75  
FINAL GEAR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

What you guy think about this one (Esprit Japan) ? look at the L shape carbon brackets, they looked less than 1/8" thick. If downforce can take out a 1/4" T shape bracket, how long you think this wing brakcet will hold on a GTR ?


Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 09:59 AM
  #76  
Momentum's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Default

It will support the load easily. The stands look well designed. If the stands can not flex laterally and are mounted to a "solid" part of the body there will be no bending moment on the brackets riveted to the wing. The thin brackets can easily withstand the downforce and any forces from drag.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 11:23 AM
  #77  
trinydex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BKL,Apr 22 2010, 02:25 AM
That is not correct. The lever arm length does not change from the wing to the attachment point of the hardpoint to the top of the stand. The torque remains the same.

The torque at the bottom of the base (attached to the trunk of the car), is the one that increases.


someone already made a diagram of what is happening.

as you can see in order to deflect the top laterally you need to deflect the bottom. it's easier to deflect the bottom if the lever arm (the stands) are taller. with larger deflections possible on the bottom, the top also can then become more deflected (laterally).
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #78  
BKL's Avatar
BKL
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

I understand what you mean now.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 06:10 PM
  #79  
PrOsPeCt S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by krazik,Apr 14 2010, 01:29 PM
I saw this video on another thread. the driver goes thru a highspeed corner without the wing and has no problem with it/.

this crash has almost nothing to do w/ the lost wing and a ton to do with driver talent.
He lifted at the beging of the up hill esses 1 and he was going way to fast to ever make it through the esses, The GT Car's I work on go through there @ 150 and they have to breathe a lil to make it. This was not a result of the wing breaking. It broke after he hit the wall backwards.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kenny_Stang
Car and Bike Talk
40
Apr 8, 2015 09:01 AM
Vik2000
Car and Bike Talk
12
Nov 17, 2010 09:35 AM
slammed ap1
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
16
Jan 22, 2008 04:35 AM
MattDell
Car and Bike Talk
2
Aug 3, 2003 12:12 PM
Michael A
Car and Bike Talk
0
May 26, 2003 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:48 PM.