So what was the final consensus on this vs the SRC?

 

Eibach- cheaper harsher
SRC- mo money mo compliant.

That's what I've heard from people but only driven SRCs.

 

Sell me your SRC's for 30% off!

 

Agree

I sold my r2

 

I have a a set of SRC in my '05 (2900lbs), which has become mostly a street car, and a set of R2's in my '07 (2700lbs) track car. The R2's with stiffer springs (1000lb square) seem much more compliant (softer high speed bump?) to me than the SRC. I do wish that the R2's could be a bit farther from the bump stops, RCA's are mandatory with the R2's.

 

This is what I've been telling myself too. Thanks for clarifying as I feel the RCA is mandatory with these as well.

 

Which SRCs? The OTS valving? Also, I know there are aero benefits to being lower, but how would RCAs help travel anymore than raising the car? Or is that the point, keep the car low and have the travel?

 

Yup. Being low and having the travel. Who wouldn't want more stroke. I have RCA front and rear. I wanted more travel out back even though I've never bottomed out the rears. The front RCA was an added benefit of the J's kit.

 

Yes, ots valving, and I purchased them used, so even though my SRC's show no signs of needing rebuild, I can't rightly compare the R2's to Evasive or CSG spec, or even known good new ots SRC's. Another note: I think that there's more room for error with the knobs on the R2's than the SRC's.

 

For those of you who have these, did you purchase the OTS 900lbs F/R setup or did you go with something different? What is your overall review for street/autox/track days? If you didn't go with the 900 setup what did you go with and why?

Thanks guys