Huge SCCA Stock class changes proposed
Originally Posted by odb812' timestamp='1366837820' post='22497087
When will the official rules for next year be published and at what point do you have confidence that the changes in the fastrack are going to make it to the official rules?
Originally Posted by ViperASR' timestamp='1366839070' post='22497138
[quote name='odb812' timestamp='1366837820' post='22497087']
When will the official rules for next year be published and at what point do you have confidence that the changes in the fastrack are going to make it to the official rules?
When will the official rules for next year be published and at what point do you have confidence that the changes in the fastrack are going to make it to the official rules?
[/quote]
Yea, I heard he bailed. However the car will be able to actually get camber next year which will help. And we will have a better idea on what a fast setup is.
Originally Posted by odb812' timestamp='1366839477' post='22497161
As long as the street tire change sticks, I'm going to pick up wheels for B stock sometime before the tires on my STR wheels go. I'm just hoping the wheel width allowance sticks, too.
Do the rules help out the rear of the Twins?
edit: I don't think it does. If it's not modifiable/slottable or adjustable from the factory, it's still not able to gain more camber.
I think the Twins can get closer to the MSR with more front camber but I still have my doubts if it will equal.
edit: I don't think it does. If it's not modifiable/slottable or adjustable from the factory, it's still not able to gain more camber.
I think the Twins can get closer to the MSR with more front camber but I still have my doubts if it will equal.
Originally Posted by odb812' timestamp='1366839477' post='22497161
As long as the street tire change sticks, I'm going to pick up wheels for B stock sometime before the tires on my STR wheels go. I'm just hoping the wheel width allowance sticks, too.
Then buy CCWs. You can't give an unlimited width without basically forcing everyone to HAVE to buy aftermarket wheels.
The provision was to give people tire options, not wheel options as a goal. Certain "fast" tires don't come in either small or large diameter. Having the +1 / -1 provision allows you to even have an option if you started with 14's or 20's.
The provision was to give people tire options, not wheel options as a goal. Certain "fast" tires don't come in either small or large diameter. Having the +1 / -1 provision allows you to even have an option if you started with 14's or 20's.
Then buy CCWs. You can't give an unlimited width without basically forcing everyone to HAVE to buy aftermarket wheels.
The provision was to give people tire options, not wheel options as a goal. Certain "fast" tires don't come in either small or large diameter. Having the +1 / -1 provision allows you to even have an option if you started with 14's or 20's.
The provision was to give people tire options, not wheel options as a goal. Certain "fast" tires don't come in either small or large diameter. Having the +1 / -1 provision allows you to even have an option if you started with 14's or 20's.
I agree unlimited width wouldn't be a good idea, but I think it would be a good idea to give maybe +/-1" or .5" just have some leeway. It seems the goal is to make stock classes more welcoming to new drivers and I'd be willing to bet the most common aftermarket part a novice driver shows up with is aftermarket wheels. As far as forcing the competitive guys to buy aftermarket wheels, I think it would be better to make someone who is already invested in the sport pay a couple hundred dollars to stay competitive than to force a bunch of new drivers into a class where they are not going to be competitive, get discouraged, and possibly quit the sport, just because their rear wheels are 9" wide instead of 8.5".
Originally Posted by CKit' timestamp='1366928424' post='22499911
Then buy CCWs. You can't give an unlimited width without basically forcing everyone to HAVE to buy aftermarket wheels.
The provision was to give people tire options, not wheel options as a goal. Certain "fast" tires don't come in either small or large diameter. Having the +1 / -1 provision allows you to even have an option if you started with 14's or 20's.
The provision was to give people tire options, not wheel options as a goal. Certain "fast" tires don't come in either small or large diameter. Having the +1 / -1 provision allows you to even have an option if you started with 14's or 20's.
I agree unlimited width wouldn't be a good idea, but I think it would be a good idea to give maybe +/-1" or .5" just have some leeway. It seems the goal is to make stock classes more welcoming to new drivers and I'd be willing to bet the most common aftermarket part a novice driver shows up with is aftermarket wheels. As far as forcing the competitive guys to buy aftermarket wheels, I think it would be better to make someone who is already invested in the sport pay a couple hundred dollars to stay competitive than to force a bunch of new drivers into a class where they are not going to be competitive, get discouraged, and possibly quit the sport, just because their rear wheels are 9" wide instead of 8.5".
The wheels that "competitive people" would get would be $300-400 per wheel or higher. And everyone would have to have to have them if you allowed 1" greater than stock. Who wouldn't buy that? So again, if someone random shows up with aftermarket wheels either steer them to STR (probably due to random offset as well) or just let it slide until they get hooked and good.



